Literature DB >> 12386789

Report of a study on IMRT planning strategies for ethmoid sinus cancer.

Filip Claus1, Ben Mijnheer, Coen Rasch, Thomas Bortfeld, Benedick Fraass, Werner De Gersem, Holger Wirtz, Cordelia Hoinkis, Byung Chul Cho, Lai Wan Dora Kwong, Hoonsik Bae, Karin Muller, Wilfried De Neve.   

Abstract

AIM: This communication reviews the planning strategies and dose statistics of nine IMRT plans generated for a complex head and neck case. PATIENT AND
METHOD: An ethmoid sinus cancer case was sent as an IMRT planning task to all participants of the ESTRO course on "IMRT and Other Conformal Techniques in Practice", held in Amsterdam in June 2001.
RESULTS: Nine IMRT plans were generated for the case, the majority of the plans generated with commercial planning systems. The number of beam incidences ranged between four and eleven, while five of the nine beam setups were coplanar. The planning target volume dose homogeneity was inversely correlated with the degree of sparing of the surrounding organs at risk.
CONCLUSION: IMRT strategies for complex head and neck cases, such as ethmoid sinus cancer, can be strikingly different in various aspects, such as beam setup, total number of segments, PTV dose coverage and dose statistics for organs at risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12386789     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-002-0999-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  13 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Gang Peng; Yang Ke; Tao Wang; Yiming Feng; Yuehua Li; Gang Wu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-16

Review 2.  Current status of IMRT in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jaime Gomez-Millan; Jesús Romero Fernández; Jose Antonio Medina Carmona
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-20

3.  Coplanar VMAT vs. noncoplanar VMAT in the treatment of sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Ning Zhong-Hua; Jiang Jing-Ting; Li Xiao-Dong; Mu Jin-Ming; Mo Jun-Chong; Jin Jian-Xue; Gao Ming; Li Qi-Lin; Gu Wen-Dong; Chen Lu-Jun; Pei Hong-Lei
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Comparative study of dose distribution between carbon ion radiotherapy and photon radiotherapy for head and neck tumor.

Authors:  M Amirul Islam; Takeshi Yanagi; Jun-Etsu Mizoe; Hideyuki Mizuno; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-09-04

Review 5.  New developments in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypoxia targeting.

Authors:  Nancy Y Lee; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3D conformal radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma : A dosimetric comparison.

Authors:  S Adeberg; S B Harrabi; N Bougatf; D Bernhardt; J Rieber; S A Koerber; M Syed; T Sprave; A Mohr; A Abdollahi; T Haberer; S E Combs; K Herfarth; J Debus; S Rieken
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal malignancies with a focus on optic pathway preservation.

Authors:  Alexander Chi; Nam P Nguyen; William Tse; Gill Sobremonte; Patrick Concannon; Angela Zhu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with carcinomas of the paranasal sinuses: clinical benefit for complex shaped target volumes.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Stephan Konkel; Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Marc W Münter; Jürgen Debus; Peter E Huber; Christoph Thilmann
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Multi-institutional comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning strategies and planning results for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Ho Park; Hee Chul Park; Suk Won Park; Do Hoon Oh; Youngmin Choi; Jeung Kee Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Won Park; Hyun Sook Suh; Rena Lee; Hoonsik Bae
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy over conventional radiotherapy with photons in young patients and adults with low-grade glioma.

Authors:  S B Harrabi; N Bougatf; A Mohr; T Haberer; K Herfarth; S E Combs; J Debus; S Adeberg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.