Literature DB >> 12386119

Liver-specific distribution of rosuvastatin in rats: comparison with pravastatin and simvastatin.

Ken-ichi Nezasa1, Kazutaka Higaki, Tadahiko Matsumura, Kazuhiro Inazawa, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Masayuki Nakano, Masahiro Koike.   

Abstract

Rosuvastatin is a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. The liver is the target organ for the lipid-regulating effect of rosuvastatin; therefore liver-selective uptake of this drug is a desirable property. The aim of this study was to investigate, and compare with pravastatin and simvastatin, the tissue-specific distribution of rosuvastatin. Bolus intravenous doses (5 mg/kg) of radiolabeled rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin were administered to rats, and initial uptake clearance (CL(uptake)) in various tissues was calculated. Hepatic CL(uptake) of rosuvastatin (0.885 ml/min/g tissue) was significantly (p < 0.001) larger than that of pravastatin (0.703 ml/min/g tissue), and rosuvastatin was taken up by the hepatic cells more selectively and efficiently than pravastatin. Hepatic CL(uptake) of simvastatin (1.24 ml/min/g tissue) was significantly larger than that of rosuvastatin (p < 0.01) and pravastatin (p < 0.001). However, adrenal CL(uptake) of simvastatin (1.55 ml/min/g tissue) was larger than hepatic CL(uptake), and simvastatin was distributed to other tissues more easily than rosuvastatin. Microautoradiography of the liver, spleen, and adrenal was undertaken 5 min after administration of the study drugs; distribution was quantified by counting the number of silver grains. After administration of rosuvastatin and pravastatin, silver grains were distributed selectively in the intracellular space of the liver, but more rosuvastatin (3.3 +/- 1.0 x 10(5) particles/mm(2)) than pravastatin (2.0 +/- 0.3 x 10(5) particles/mm(2)) tended to distribute to the liver. Simvastatin was less liver-specific (it also distributed to the spleen and adrenal). The results of this study indicated that rosuvastatin was taken up by hepatic cells more selectively and more efficiently than pravastatin and simvastatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12386119     DOI: 10.1124/dmd.30.11.1158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  24 in total

Review 1.  Impact on cognitive function-are all statins the same?

Authors:  Nishant P Shah; Kristopher J Swiger; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Determination of intracellular unbound concentrations and subcellular localization of drugs in rat sandwich-cultured hepatocytes compared with liver tissue.

Authors:  Nathan D Pfeifer; Kevin B Harris; Grace Zhixia Yan; Kim L R Brouwer
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 3.  Statin therapy in heart failure: for good, for bad, or indifferent?

Authors:  Luisa De Gennaro; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Michele Correale; Francesco Buquicchio; Pasquale Caldarola; Matteo Di Biase
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  The effect of erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin.

Authors:  K J Cooper; P D Martin; A L Dane; M J Warwick; A Raza; D W Schneck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Open-label, ascending dose, prospective cohort study evaluating the antiviral efficacy of Rosuvastatin therapy in serum and lipid fractions in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  K Patel; R Jhaveri; J George; G Qiang; C Kenedi; K Brown; C Cates; A Zekry; H L Tillmann; L Elliott; R Kilaru; J Albrecht; A Conrad; J G McHutchison
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.728

6.  Statin Use and Adrenal Aldosterone Production in Hypertensive and Diabetic Subjects.

Authors:  Rene Baudrand; Luminita H Pojoga; Anand Vaidya; Amanda E Garza; Paul A Vöhringer; Xavier Jeunemaitre; Paul N Hopkins; Tham M Yao; Jonathan Williams; Gail K Adler; Gordon H Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Neuroprotective effect of systemic and/or intravitreal rosuvastatin administration in rat glaucoma model.

Authors:  Metin Unlu; Zeynep Aktas; Pinar Uyar Gocun; Sevil Ozger Ilhan; Murat Hasanreisoglu; Berati Hasanreisoglu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  The effect of herbal medicine danshensu and ursolic acid on pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in rats.

Authors:  Jin-Hua Wen; Yu-Qing Xiong
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 9.  Cholesterol level and statin use in Alzheimer disease: II. Review of human trials and recommendations.

Authors:  Nina E Shepardson; Ganesh M Shankar; Dennis J Selkoe
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2011-11

10.  Liver toxicity of rosuvastatin therapy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Famularo; Luca Miele; Giovanni Minisola; Antonio Grieco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.