RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to establish the interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver reproducibility of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measurements obtained with electron-beam computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors evaluated electron-beam CT scans from all patients who had undergone two serial examinations on the same day as part of a study of coronary artery calcification reproducibility. In patients in whom aortic valve calcium was identified at electron-beam CT, AVC scores were measured with both the Agatston and the volumetric methods, which were developed previously to quantify coronary calcium. RESULTS: Forty-four asymptomatic patients (mean age, 66 years +/- 9) with AVC at electron-beam CT were included in the analyses. AVC score reproducibility was excellent with both the Agatston and the volumetric methods (R2 = 0.99, P = .0001 for both), with median interscan variabilities of 7% and 6.2%, respectively. Interscan reproducibility was similar, whether the analysis included all scans or was restricted to those with scores greater than 10 or greater than 30. For the volumetric method, the median interobserver variability was 5% and the median intraobserver variability was 1%. CONCLUSION: The low interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver variabilities at electron-beam CT suggest that this method should be useful for the noninvasive monitoring of AVC changes over time and for assessing the efficacy of therapies aimed at slowing AVC accumulation.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to establish the interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver reproducibility of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measurements obtained with electron-beam computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors evaluated electron-beam CT scans from all patients who had undergone two serial examinations on the same day as part of a study of coronary artery calcification reproducibility. In patients in whom aortic valve calcium was identified at electron-beam CT, AVC scores were measured with both the Agatston and the volumetric methods, which were developed previously to quantify coronary calcium. RESULTS: Forty-four asymptomatic patients (mean age, 66 years +/- 9) with AVC at electron-beam CT were included in the analyses. AVC score reproducibility was excellent with both the Agatston and the volumetric methods (R2 = 0.99, P = .0001 for both), with median interscan variabilities of 7% and 6.2%, respectively. Interscan reproducibility was similar, whether the analysis included all scans or was restricted to those with scores greater than 10 or greater than 30. For the volumetric method, the median interobserver variability was 5% and the median intraobserver variability was 1%. CONCLUSION: The low interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver variabilities at electron-beam CT suggest that this method should be useful for the noninvasive monitoring of AVC changes over time and for assessing the efficacy of therapies aimed at slowing AVC accumulation.
Authors: Jason Linefsky; Ronit Katz; Matthew Budoff; Jeffrey Probstfield; David Owens; Junichiro Takasu; David Shavelle; Pamela Ouyang; Bruce Psaty; Kevin D O'Brien Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: David S Owens; Matthew J Budoff; Ronit Katz; Junichiro Takasu; David M Shavelle; J Jeffrey Carr; Susan R Heckbert; Catherine M Otto; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Richard A Kronmal; Kevin D O'Brien Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06
Authors: Robbert W van Hamersvelt; Martin J Willemink; Richard A P Takx; Anouk L M Eikendal; Ricardo P J Budde; Tim Leiner; Christian P Mol; Ivana Isgum; Pim A de Jong Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: David S Owens; Ronit Katz; Eric Johnson; David M Shavelle; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Junichiro Takasu; John R Crouse; J Jeffrey Carr; Richard Kronmal; Matthew J Budoff; Kevin D O'Brien Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-06-09
Authors: Jason P Linefsky; Kevin D O'Brien; Michael Sachs; Ronit Katz; John Eng; Erin D Michos; Matthew J Budoff; Ian de Boer; Bryan Kestenbaum Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Donghee Han; Rhanderson Cordoso; Seamus Whelton; Alan Rozanski; Matthew J Budoff; Michael D Miedema; Khurram Nasir; Leslee J Shaw; John A Rumberger; Heidi Gransar; Zeina Dardari; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha; Daniel S Berman Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Ronit Katz; Matthew J Budoff; Junichiro Takasu; David M Shavelle; Alain Bertoni; Roger S Blumenthal; Pamela Ouyang; Nathan D Wong; Kevin D O'Brien Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Lieuwe H Piers; Riksta Dikkers; René A Tio; Maarten P van den Berg; Tineke P Willems; Felix Zijlstra; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 2.357