Literature DB >> 12384921

The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease.

Rui Cerejo1, Dorothy D Dunlop, September Cahue, David Channin, Jing Song, Leena Sharma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Varus and valgus malalignment increase the risk of medial and lateral osteoarthritis (OA) progression, respectively. The impact of a mechanical factor such as alignment depends not only on the factor itself, but also on the state of the joint. The less-damaged joint of mild OA may be less vulnerable to malalignment effects than the more-damaged joint of moderate OA. Our goal was to explore the impact of alignment on subsequent progression of knee OA according to the baseline stage of disease.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty patients with knee OA (defined by the presence of osteophytes and symptoms) recruited from the community underwent assessment of both lower limbs at baseline and at an 18-month followup. Alignment was measured on a full-limb radiograph as the angle made by the intersection of the femoral and tibial mechanical axes. Compartment-specific progression was defined as an increase between baseline and 18 months in the grade of severity of joint space narrowing on radiographs of semiflexed knees taken after fluoroscopic confirmation of position. Knees were grouped according to their baseline stage of OA as Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grades 0-1, 2, or 3. Progression odds ratios were estimated from logistic regression using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: There were 377 K/L grade 0-3 knees in 230 subjects (173 women and 57 men, mean age 64.0 years, mean body mass index 30.4 kg/m(2)) in this longitudinal study. In knees with mild OA (K/L grade 2), the odds of 18-month progression in the medial compartment were significantly increased 4-fold by varus alignment at baseline. In K/L grade 2 knees, the odds of lateral progression were increased 2-fold by valgus alignment (approaching significance). In knees with moderate OA (K/L grade 3), the risk of progression was comparably increased by varus or valgus alignment (10-fold).
CONCLUSION: While some effect of malalignment was suggested at almost all stages of knee OA examined, the impact of varus or valgus malalignment on the odds of OA progression over the ensuing 18 months was greater in knees with moderate (K/L grade 3) OA at baseline, possibly due to greater joint vulnerability with some contribution from slightly more severe malalignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384921     DOI: 10.1002/art.10530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  66 in total

1.  Realignment osteotomies in the treatment of chronic instabilities of the knee associated with malalignment (case report).

Authors:  Kerem Bilsel; Mehmet Erdil; Mehmet Elmadag; Cengiz Sen
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-20

Review 2.  Biological aspects of early osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Henning Madry; Frank P Luyten; Andrea Facchini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Saker Khamaisy; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Ran Thein; Brian P Gladnick; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Relationship of limb length inequality with radiographic knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Y M Golightly; K D Allen; J B Renner; C G Helmick; A Salazar; J M Jordan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Stress shielding in the bony chain of leg in presence of varus or valgus knee.

Authors:  Vincenzo Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17

Review 6.  Knee osteoarthritis diagnosis, treatment and associated factors of progression: part II.

Authors:  Behzad Heidari
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2011

7.  Implantation of mesenchymal stem cells in combination with allogenic cartilage improves cartilage regeneration and clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Yong Sang Kim; Pill Ku Chung; Dong Suk Suh; Dong Beom Heo; Dae Hyun Tak; Yong Gon Koh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Reliability of lower limb alignment measures using an established landmark-based method with a customized computer software program.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sled; Lisa M Sheehy; David T Felson; Patrick A Costigan; Miu Lam; T Derek V Cooke
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  T1rho MRI relaxation in knee OA subjects with varying sizes of cartilage lesions.

Authors:  Richard B Souza; Brian T Feeley; Zinta A Zarins; Thomas M Link; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Proximal tibial osteophytes and their relationship with the height of the tibial spines of the intercondylar eminence: paleopathological study.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Hayeri; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Debra J Trudell; Tori Heflin; Tori Hefflin; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.