Literature DB >> 12384801

Metachronous colon tumors: risk factors and rationale for the surveillance colonoscopy after initial polypectomy.

Yasushi Fukutomi1, Hisataka Moriwaki, Seisuke Nagase, Masahiro Tajika, Tomoo Naito, Yoshiyuki Miwa, Yasuhiro Yamada, Hiroshi Araki, Masataka Okuno, Kazuo Nagura, Tomohiro Kato, Mitsuo Ninomiya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the possible risk factors for metachronous colon tumors after endoscopic resection of initial tumors.
METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-one patients entered the surveillance study after colonoscopic resection of initial tumors between 1985 and 1999. Histology of initial tumors was adenoma in 214 patients and carcinoma in 107 patients. Solitary tumor was observed in 196 patients and multiple tumors in 125 at initial endoscopy. The median surveillance period was 39 (range, 12-112) months, and the median frequency of surveillance colonoscopy was three (range, 2-10) times.
RESULTS: Metachronous neoplasms were identified in 114 of 321 surveillance cases (36%). In the 114 cases, the number of patients with metachronous adenoma was 103 (90%) and that of carcinoma was 11 (10%). Clinical characteristics at entry - including age, gender, multiplicity of polyp, histology of polyp, and site of polyp - were not different between patients with metachronous tumors and those without metachronous tumors. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with a histology of carcinoma and those with multiple polyps at entry developed metachronous tumors significantly earlier than did patients with initial adenomas and initial solitary polyp, respectively ( P<0.001, P<0.001). However, other characteristics at entry did not produce significant differences in the rate of the development of metachronous tumors using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Proportional hazards model analysis revealed that histology of the initial tumor as carcinoma (relative risk, 1.690, 95% confidence interval, 1.118-2.555) and multiplicity (1.472, 1011-2.143) were significant risk factors for metachronous colon tumors. The 75%, 50%, and 25% metachronous tumor-free periods after initial polypectomy were 14, 21, and 39 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These results may help optimizing surveillance strategies for metachronous colon tumors and raising the economic benefit of colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384801     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-002-0375-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  9 in total

1.  Metachronous colorectal cancer in Taiwan: analyzing 20 years of data from Taiwan Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Tzu-An Chen; Jorng-Tzong Horng; Wen-Chu Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Various clinicopathological features of patients with metachronous colorectal cancer in relation to different diagnostic intervals.

Authors:  Po-Yen Lin; Jy-Ming Chiang; Hsin-Yun Huang; Jeng-Fu You; Sum-Fu Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Rei-Ping Tang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Hiroshi Nishida; Toshiaki Watanabe; Tamotsu Sugai; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Nobuo Hiwatashi; Hiroshi Saito; Mamoru Watanabe; Kentaro Sugano; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Metachronous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M G Pramateftakis; P Hatzigianni; D Kanellos; G Vrakas; Th Tsachalis; I Mantzoros; I Kanellos; C Lazaridis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Adenocarcinoma occurring from a sigmoid colostomy 20 years after Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Yusuke Kitagawa; Shigeo Hirasaki; Michiya Bando
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-06

6.  Factors predictive of high-risk adenomas at the third colonoscopy after initial adenoma removal.

Authors:  Sook Hee Chung; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Mi Sung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?

Authors:  Jung Lok Lee; Jae Myung Cha; Hye Min Lee; Jung Won Jeon; Min Seob Kwak; Jin Young Yoon; Hyun Phil Shin; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 8.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Ryoichi Nozaki; Tamotsu Sugai; Shiro Oka; Michio Itabashi; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Hiroshi Nishida; Hiroto Miwa; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Tooru Shimosegawa; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Can surveillance colonoscopy be discontinued in an elderly population with diminutive polyps?

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Katsuaki Inagaki; Yuki Okamoto; Kenta Matsumoto; Kazuki Boda; Ken Yamashita; Kyoku Sumimoto; Yuki Ninomiya; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2019-07-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.