Literature DB >> 12384736

Surgical and clinical results with the PDN prosthetic disc-nucleus device.

R Bertagnoli1, R Schönmayr.   

Abstract

The PDN prosthetic disc-nucleus device has been in use for 6 years, both in clinical trials and through commercial sale. Surgical and clinical data for the device have been collected and analyzed to help determine the strengths and limitations of the implant. The shape of the device has been found to be an important element in predicting surgical success, with wedge and rectangular devices being the most stable. The patient's disc dimensions are also critically important. Data indicate that patients with a disc height of less than 5 mm should be excluded from surgery. Moreover, the anterior-posterior (AP) diameter of the disc endplates must be 37 mm or more in order to properly situate two devices within the disc--patients with a smaller AP diameter should receive only a single device. Body mass and overall patient weight are also good predictors of surgical success. If the patient's body mass index is 30 or greater, then the patient should not receive the implants. Complications related to the PDN implant have included migration of the device and endplate remodeling in some patients. This endplate remodeling has usually been mild, and has occurred in response to the change in load distribution. In a few cases there has been more pronounced remodeling with a loss of disc height. To minimize endplate remodeling, the PDN hydrogel has been reformulated to be softer, absorbing 80% of its weight in water. Subsequent to implementing changes in device design and patient selection, and with the introduction of the ALPA (Anterior-Lateral transPsoatic Approach) technique for implanting the devices, there has been an increase in surgical success with a concomitant reduction in the number of revision surgeries. The current surgical success rate for patients implanted from 1999 through 2001 is 88%. Clinical results are also very encouraging, with marked decreases in Oswestry and visual analog scale pain levels, and disc height also shows improvement and stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384736      PMCID: PMC3611569          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0424-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Injectable silk fibroin/polyurethane composite hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement.

Authors:  Jingen Hu; Bin Chen; Fang Guo; Jingyu Du; Pengcheng Gu; Xiangjin Lin; Weiping Yang; Hailong Zhang; Min Lu; Yiping Huang; Gewen Xu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Long-term outcome after implantation of prosthetic disc nucleus device (PDN) in lumbar disc disease.

Authors:  P Selviaridis; N Foroglou; A Tsitlakidis; A Hatzisotiriou; I Magras; I Patsalas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Thermogelling bioadhesive scaffolds for intervertebral disk tissue engineering: preliminary in vitro comparison of aldehyde-based versus alginate microparticle-mediated adhesion.

Authors:  C Wiltsey; T Christiani; J Williams; J Scaramazza; C Van Sciver; K Toomer; J Sheehan; A Branda; A Nitzl; E England; J Kadlowec; C Iftode; J Vernengo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Characterization of injectable hydrogels based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-g-chondroitin sulfate with adhesive properties for nucleus pulposus tissue engineering.

Authors:  Craig Wiltsey; Pamela Kubinski; Thomas Christiani; Katelynn Toomer; Joseph Sheehan; Amanda Branda; Jennifer Kadlowec; Cristina Iftode; Jennifer Vernengo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  An injectable nucleus replacement as an adjunct to microdiscectomy: 2 year follow-up in a pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Ulrich Berlemann; Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lateral interbody fusion for treatment of discogenic low back pain: minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Carlos Castro; Thiago Coutinho; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-04-03

7.  Biomechanical behavior of a new nucleus prosthesis made of knitted titanium filaments.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; Hans-Peter Kaps; Bodo Haegele; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-11-01

8.  Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons.

Authors:  Hassan Serhan; Devdatt Mhatre; Henri Defossez; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-09-01

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence.

Authors:  Steven A Rundell; Jorge E Isaza; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-03-01

10.  Screening for nuclear replacement candidates in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Ioannis Pappou; Frank Cammisa; Elias Papadopoulos; Peter Frelinghuysen; Federico Girardi
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.