Literature DB >> 12384547

Immunogenicity of a plasmid DNA vaccine encoding chimeric idiotype in patients with B-cell lymphoma.

John M Timmerman1, Gita Singh, Gary Hermanson, Peter Hobart, Debra K Czerwinski, Behnaz Taidi, Ranjani Rajapaksa, Clemens B Caspar, Adrienne Van Beckhoven, Ronald Levy.   

Abstract

B-cell lymphomas express tumor-specific immunoglobulin, the variable regions of which [idiotype (Id)] can serve as a target for active immunotherapy. Promising results have been obtained in clinical studies of Id vaccination using Id proteins.However, Id protein is laborious and time-consuming to produce. DNA vaccination is an attractive alternative for delivering Id vaccines, because Id DNA can be rapidly isolated by PCR techniques. DNA coding for lymphoma Id can provide protective immunity in murine models. In the present study, we performed a Phase I/II clinical trial to study the safety and immunogenicity of naked DNA Id vaccines in 12 patients with follicular B-cell lymphoma. The DNA encoded a chimeric immunoglobulin molecule containing variable heavy and light chain immunoglobulin sequences derived from each patient's tumor, linked to the IgG2a and kappa mouse immunoglobulin (MsIg) heavy- and light-chain constant regions chains, respectively. Patients in remission after chemotherapy received three monthly i.m. injections of the DNA in three dose escalation cohorts of four patients each (200, 600, and 1800 micro g). After vaccination, 7 of 12 patients mounted either humoral (n = 4) or T-cell-proliferative (n = 4) responses to the MsIg component of the vaccine. In one patient, a T-cell response specific to autologous Id was also measured. Anti-Id antibodies were not detectable in any patient. A second series of vaccinations was then administered using a needle-free injection device (Biojector) to deliver 1800 micro g both i.m. and intradermally (i.d.); 9 of 12 patients had humoral (n = 6) and/or T-cell (n = 4) responses to MsIg. Six of 12 patients exhibited humoral and/or T-cell anti-Id responses; yet, these were cross-reactive with Id proteins from other patient's tumors. Subsequently, a third series of vaccinations was carried out using 500 micro g of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor DNA mixed with 1800 micro g of Id DNA. The proportion of patients responding to MsIg remained essentially unchanged (8 of 12), although humoral or T-cell responses were boosted in some cases. Throughout the study, no significant side effects or toxicities were observed. Despite the modest level of antitumor immune responses in this study, DNA vaccine technology retains potential advantages in developing anti-Id immunotherapies. Additional studies are warranted to optimize vaccine dose, routes of administration, vector designs, and prime-boost strategies. These results will help guide the design of such future DNA vaccine trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  45 in total

1.  Use of transgenic HLA A*0201/Kb and HHD II mice to evaluate frequency of cytomegalovirus IE1-derived peptide usage in eliciting human CD8 cytokine response.

Authors:  Ghislaine Gallez-Hawkins; Maria C Villacres; Xiuli Li; Margaret C Sanborn; Norma A Lomeli; John A Zaia
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Physical trauma of vaccination acts as a wake-up call to dangers in the skin.

Authors:  Fiona J Culley; Wieslawa Olszewska
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Vaccination strategies for lymphomas.

Authors:  Mohammed M Dar; Larry W Kwak
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Progress on new vaccine strategies for the immunotherapy and prevention of cancer.

Authors:  Jay A Berzofsky; Masaki Terabe; SangKon Oh; Igor M Belyakov; Jeffrey D Ahlers; John E Janik; John C Morris
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Cell-free production of scFv fusion proteins: an efficient approach for personalized lymphoma vaccines.

Authors:  Gregory Kanter; Junhao Yang; Alexei Voloshin; Shoshana Levy; James R Swartz; Ronald Levy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Developing idiotype vaccines for lymphoma: from preclinical studies to phase III clinical trials.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Park; Sattva S Neelapu
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Experimental study on therapeutic effect of in vivo expression of Cell I-Hep II recombinant polypeptide of fibronectin on murine H22 hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gui-Mei Zhang; Yan Yang; Bo Huang; Hui Xiao; Dong Li; Zuo-Hua Feng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Immunotherapy for lymphomas.

Authors:  John M Timmerman
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Active immunotherapy: current state of the art in vaccine approaches for NHL.

Authors:  M Lia Palomba
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  DNA vaccines: developing new strategies against cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Fioretti; Sandra Iurescia; Vito Michele Fazio; Monica Rinaldi
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.