Literature DB >> 12384404

Flow cytometric disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: the relationship between normal and neoplastic plasma cells predicts outcome after transplantation.

Andy C Rawstron1, Faith E Davies, Ranjit DasGupta, A John Ashcroft, Russell Patmore, Mark T Drayson, Roger G Owen, Andrew S Jack, J Anthony Child, Gareth J Morgan.   

Abstract

Conventional monitoring strategies for myeloma are not sufficiently sensitive to identify patients likely to benefit from further therapy immediately after transplantation. We have used a sensitive flow cytometry assay that quantitates normal and neoplastic plasma cells to monitor the bone marrow of 45 patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Neoplastic plasma cells were detectable at 3 months after transplantation in 42% of patients. Once detected, neoplastic cell levels increased steadily until clinical progression: these patients had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 20 months) than those with no detectable disease (median, longer than 35 months; P =.003). Neoplastic plasma cells were detectable in 27% (9 of 33) of immunofixation-negative complete-remission patients. These patients had a significantly shorter PFS than immunofixation-negative patients with no detectable neoplastic plasma cells (P =.04). Normal plasma cells were present in 89% of patients immediately after transplantation, but were not sustained in most cases. Patients with only normal phenotype plasma cells present at 3 months after transplantation and also at second assessment had a low risk of disease progression. Patients with neoplastic plasma cells present at 3 months after transplantation, or with only normal plasma cells present at first assessment and only neoplastic plasma cells at second assessment, had a significantly higher risk of early disease progression (P <.0001) with a 5-year survival of 54% for the high-risk group, compared with 100% in the low-risk group (P =.036). Analysis of normal and neoplastic plasma cell levels is more sensitive than immunofixation and can identify which patients may benefit from additional treatment strategies at an early stage after transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384404     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  39 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow immunohistology of plasma cell neoplasms.

Authors:  A Wei; S Juneja
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Novel analysis of clonal diversification in blood B cell and bone marrow plasma cell clones in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis.

Authors:  Roshini S Abraham; Michelle K Manske; Neta S Zuckerman; Abhishek Sohni; Hanna Edelman; Gitit Shahaf; Michael M Timm; Angela Dispenzieri; Morie A Gertz; Ramit Mehr
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Clinical impact of immunophenotypic remission after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  L Giaccone; L Brunello; M Festuccia; M Gilestro; E Maffini; F Ferrando; E Talamo; R Passera; M Boccadoro; P Omedè; B Bruno
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Myeloma cell contamination of peripheral blood stem-cell grafts can predict the outcome in multiple myeloma patients after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Wichard Vogel; Hans-Georg Kopp; Lothar Kanz; Hermann Einsele
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Assessment of bone marrow plasma cell infiltrates in multiple myeloma: the added value of CD138 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Samer Z Al-Quran; Lijun Yang; James M Magill; Raul C Braylan; Vonda K Douglas-Nikitin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jorge Cerveró; Gema Mateo; Jose J Pérez; Maria A Montalbán; Anna Sureda; Laura Montejano; Norma C Gutiérrez; Alfonso García de Coca; Natalia de Las Heras; Maria V Mateos; Maria C López-Berges; Raimundo García-Boyero; Josefina Galende; Jose Hernández; Luis Palomera; Dolores Carrera; Rafael Martínez; Javier de la Rubia; Alejandro Martín; Joan Bladé; Juan J Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Proceedings from the National Cancer Institute's Second International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: part II. Autologous Transplantation-novel agents and immunomodulatory strategies.

Authors:  David Avigan; Parameswaran Hari; Minoo Battiwalla; Michael R Bishop; Sergio A Giralt; Nancy M Hardy; Nicolaus Kröger; Alan S Wayne; Katharine C Hsu
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Nurhan Ergül; Hediye Ciftci; Güven Cetin; Sebnem Izmir Güner; Teyfik Fikret Cermik
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  MRD-driven treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  O Landgren; S Giralt
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.