Literature DB >> 12384201

The effect of extending the pill-free interval on follicular activity: triphasic norgestimate/35 micro g ethinyl estradiol versus monophasic levonorgestrel/20 micro g ethinyl estradiol.

Mitchell D Creinin1, Joel S Lippman, Scott E Eder, Amy J Godwin, William Olson.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate follicular activity in women taking oral contraceptives with imposed imperfect compliance. After completing a 28-day cycle of either triphasic norgestimate/EE (NGM/EE) (Ortho Tri-Cyclen, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ) or monophasic levonorgestrel/EE (LNG/EE) (Alesse, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA), women were instructed to intentionally "miss" the first two active pills of the next pack. The first two tablets in the second treatment cycle were deliberately omitted, thereby extending the pill-free interval from 7 days to 9 days. Subjects were randomized to take NGM/EE (n = 40) or LNG/EE (n = 39) for two consecutive cycles. The mean maximum follicular diameter was significantly greater in women taking LNG/EE than in those taking NGM/EE (16.4 +/- 7.1 mm vs. 12.6 +/- 8.3 mm, p = 0.047). The LNG/EE group had significantly higher median serum estradiol concentrations compared to women taking NGM/EE on pill Days 10 [29.5 pg/mL (range: 10.0-540.0 pg/mL) vs. 2.5 pg/mL (range: 2.0-6.0 pg/mL), p < 0.001] and 14 [11.0 pg/mL (range: 2.0-416.0 pg/mL) vs. 2.0 pg/mL (range: 2.0-3.0 pg/mL), p = 0.001]. Two women in the NGM/EE group and three women in the LNG/EE group had at least one progesterone level > or =3 ng/mL; none of these women demonstrated a maximum follicular diameter >13 mm. Significantly greater follicular activity was observed after an extended pill-free interval in women taking LNG/EE compared to those taking triphasic NGM/EE. The clinical implications of these findings require further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384201     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00344-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

1.  Challenges and methodology for testing young healthy women in physiological studies.

Authors:  Nina S Stachenfeld; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 2.  Effect of missed combined hormonal contraceptives on contraceptive effectiveness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Maria W Steenland; Dalia Brahmi; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Blood pressure and water regulation: understanding sex hormone effects within and between men and women.

Authors:  Megan M Wenner; Nina S Stachenfeld
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Ovarian follicular development during the use of oral contraception: a review.

Authors:  Angela R Baerwald; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.