Literature DB >> 12384163

Impact of age on total and complexed prostate-specific antigen cutoffs in a contemporary referral series of men with prostate cancer.

Robert W Veltri1, M Craig Miller, Gerard J O'dowd, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

Age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutoffs were previously suggested and were found to miss significant cancers in older men. We assessed the influence of an age-adjusted PSA cutoff to optimize the diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) of complexed PSA (cPSA) and total PSA (tPSA) in the differentiation of benign disease from prostate cancer using a contemporary referral patient cohort. The cPSA and tPSA values were determined using the Bayer Immuno 1 system. The diagnostic utility of tPSA and cPSA was assessed using a diverse contemporary test population consisting of sera prospectively collected between June 1999 and October 2000 from 3597 men who recently underwent a systematic biopsy by urologists in clinical practices throughout the United States. This contemporary patient sample had biopsy diagnoses of either no evidence of malignancy (NEM; N = 2189) or prostate cancer (n = 1408). All serum samples had tPSA values between 2.0 and 20.0 ng/mL. The mean tPSAs (ng/mL) for the NEM and prostate cancer groups were 7.1 +/- 3.2 and 7.3 +/- 3.3, respectively (P = 0.026). The mean cPSAs (ng/mL) for the NEM and prostate cancer groups were 5.6 +/- 2.7 and 6.0 +/- 2.9, respectively (P <0.001). As the tPSA increased from 2.0 to 10.0 ng/mL, the cancer detection rate remained relatively constant at approximately 39% when evaluated using increments of 2.0 ng/mL for tPSA. For fixed sensitivities of 80%, 85%, 90%, and 95%, as the age range increased (45 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, >or=80), the tPSA and cPSA assay cutoffs required to sustain the specified sensitivity level markedly increased, with the exception of the 95% sensitivity level, where the cutoffs only slightly increased between the age ranges of 45 to 69 and >or=70. Overall, cPSA showed a marginal improvement in specificity versus tPSA across all age groups at all sensitivity levels. In this community referral population, the cancer detection rate remained fairly constant over the tPSA range of 2.0 to 20.0 ng/mL. This study demonstrated that to maintain a given sensitivity level for cPSA and tPSA in the age ranges studied, continuous upward adjustment of the cutoffs was required as age increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384163     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01695-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Historical prostate cancer screening and treatment outcomes from a single institution.

Authors:  Deanna S Cross; Mark Ritter; Douglas J Reding
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-04-25

2.  Validity of Prostate Health Index and Percentage of [-2] Pro-Prostate-Specific Antigen as Novel Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Omani Tertiary Hospitals Experience.

Authors:  Safana S Al Saidi; Nafila B Al Riyami; Mohammed S Al Marhoon; Mohammed S Al Saraf; Salim S Al Busaidi; Riad Bayoumi; Waad-Allah S Mula-Abed
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-07

3.  Metabolomics: a novel approach to early and noninvasive prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Matthew J Roberts; Horst J Schirra; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-02-19

4.  Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage?

Authors:  F Strittmatter; P Stieber; D Nagel; C Füllhase; S Walther; C G Stief; R Waidelich
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 5.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Discovery and validation of urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dan Theodorescu; Eric Schiffer; Hartwig W Bauer; Friedrich Douwes; Frank Eichhorn; Reinhard Polley; Thomas Schmidt; Wolfgang Schöfer; Petra Zürbig; David M Good; Joshua J Coon; Harald Mischak
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Age-specific prostate specific antigen cutoffs for guiding biopsy decision in Chinese population.

Authors:  Rong Na; Yishuo Wu; Jianfeng Xu; Haowen Jiang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Liquid Biopsy Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Neuhaus; Bo Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21

10.  The routine use of prostate-specific antigen for early detection of cancer prostate in India: Is it justified?

Authors:  Deepak Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.