Literature DB >> 12384157

Complexed prostate-specific antigen as a staging tool: results based on a multicenter prospective evaluation of complexed prostate-specific antigen in cancer diagnosis.

Samir S Taneja1, Elias I Hsu, Carol D Cheli, Paul Walden, Georg Bartsch, Wolfgang Horninger, Richard J Babaian, Herbert A Fritsche, Stacy Childs, Thomas A Stamey, Lori J Sokoll, Daniel W Chan, Michael K Brawer, Alan W Partin, Herbert Lepor.   

Abstract

Within a 7-site prospective evaluation of the Bayer complexed prostate-specific antigen PSA (cPSA) assay, we analyzed the ability of cPSA to predict extracapsular extension (ECE) before radical prostatectomy. Included in this analysis were 152 men diagnosed with cancer, who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Sera were tested with the Bayer total PSA (tPSA) and cPSA assays, and the Beckman free PSA (fPSA) and tPSA assays. Treating surgical pathology result as a binary variable (organ confined vs ECE), mean tPSA, cPSA, fPSA/tPSA (f/tPSA) ratios, tPSA density (tPSAD), and cPSA density (cPSAD) were compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate analysis. In all, 28 men (18.4%) had pathologically identified ECE. Between those with and without ECE, significant differences were observed for tPSA (P = 0.0127), cPSA (P = 0.0120), tPSAD (P = 0.0001), and cPSAD (P = 0.0002), but not f/tPSA (P = 0.3774) or c/tPSA (P = 0.2882). All tested parameters except f/tPSA (P = 0.376) and c/tPSA (P = 0.288) predicted ECE (P <0.05) by logistic regression. The ROC area under the curve (AUC) was identical for tPSA and cPSA (0.621) and for tPSAD (0.692) and cPSAD (0.691). Kendall-tau correlation coefficients also demonstrated the strongest correlation with ECE for cPSAD and tPSAD. Either alone or as a tPSAD calculation, cPSA carries equivalent staging ability to tPSA. The use of f/tPSA appears to be less effective in staging than either cPSA or tPSA, whereas the use of either cPSAD or tPSAD provides maximal staging accuracy. Therefore, cPSA could be applied as an accurate predictor of ECE independently or in a nomogram along with other predictive variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384157     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01720-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse pathologic features prediction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  DNA Ploidy as surrogate for biopsy gleason score for preoperative organ versus nonorgan-confined prostate cancer prediction.

Authors:  Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Density as a Powerful Predictor of Extracapsular Extension and Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Prostatectomy Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels of Less than 10 ng/ml.

Authors:  Jin-Seok Chang; Hoon Choi; Young-Seop Chang; Jin-Bum Kim; Mi Mi Oh; Du Geon Moon; Jae Hyun Bae; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-12-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.