Literature DB >> 12383646

Protective immunity against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens in the absence of virus-specific antibodies.

Hung-Yueh Yeh1, Silke Rautenschlein, Jagdev M Sharma.   

Abstract

The role of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) in pathogenesis of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) was investigated. One-day-old specific pathogen-free chickens were treated with 3mg of cyclophosphamide (Cy) per chicken for 4 consecutive days and, 3 weeks later, infected with the IBDV-IM strain. Chickens were examined for: (a) mitogenic response of splenocytes to ConA, as an indicator of T-cell functions in vitro, (b) antibody against IBDV by ELISA, (c) IBDV genome in various tissues by RT-PCR and (d) immunological memory. At the time of IBDV infection, Cy-treated chickens had depleted bursal tissue (an avian primary B-cell lymphoid organ), severely compromised antibody-producing ability, but normal T-cell response to ConA. In primary infection, no detectable antibody against IBDV antigen in Cy-treated, IBDV-infected chickens was observed up to 28 days post-infection (PI), while IBDV genome was detected by RT-PCR in spleen, thymus, liver and blood until 10 days PI. Like intact control chickens infected with IBDV, Cy-treated, IBDV-infected chickens suppressed splenocytes responses to ConA from 5 to 10 days PI, suggesting that intact control as well as Cy-treated chickens responded similarly to IBDV infection in the early phase. Following re-infection with IBDV, no detectable secondary antibody response to IBDV as well as IBDV genome in tissues were observed in Cy-treated chickens, while intact control chickens developed vigorous secondary antibody response. Similar to intact control chickens infected with IBDV, Cy-treated chickens after second infection with IBDV did not suppress splenocyte response to ConA. These results suggested that in the absence of detectable anti-IBDV antibodies, protection of Cy-treated chickens from IBDV infection may occur via immunological memory mediated by CMI. We concluded that under normal conditions, IBDV induces a protective antibody response, however, in the absence of antibody, CMI alone is adequate in protecting birds against virulent IBDV. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12383646     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2427(02)00206-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  8 in total

1.  Fas/FasL and perforin-granzyme pathways mediated T cell cytotoxic responses in infectious bursal disease virus infected chickens.

Authors:  Abdul Rauf; Mahesh Khatri; Maria V Murgia; Yehia M Saif
Journal:  Results Immunol       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 2.  Economically important non-oncogenic immunosuppressive viral diseases of chicken--current status.

Authors:  V Balamurugan; J M Kataria
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Impact of coccidial infection on vaccine- and vvIBDV in lymphoid tissues of SPF chickens as detected by RT-PCR.

Authors:  Susanne Kabell; Kurt J Handberg; Magne Bisgaard
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Changes of CD4+CD25+ cells ratio in immune organs from chickens challenged with infectious bursal disease virus strains with varying virulences.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Yu; Lei Rui; Qiang Shao; Haiwen Liu; Yanan Lu; Yongchao Zhang; Zandong Li
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Immunomodulatory Potential of Tinospora cordifolia and CpG ODN (TLR21 Agonist) against the Very Virulent, Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in SPF Chicks.

Authors:  Swati Sachan; Kuldeep Dhama; Shyma K Latheef; Hari Abdul Samad; Asok Kumar Mariappan; Palanivelu Munuswamy; Rajendra Singh; Karam Pal Singh; Yashpal Singh Malik; Raj Kumar Singh
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-04

6.  Immunopathological comparison of in ovo and post-hatch vaccination techniques for infectious bursal disease vaccine in layer chicks.

Authors:  Iqra Zaheer; Wei Chen; Ahrar Khan; Abdelmotaleb Elokil; Muhammad Kashif Saleemi; Tean Zaheer; Muhammad Zargham Khan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Protection of chicken against very virulent IBDV provided by in ovo priming with DNA vaccine and boosting with killed vaccine and the adjuvant effects of plasmid-encoded chicken interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Park; Haan Woo Sung; Byung Il Yoon; Hyuk Moo Kwon
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Molecular cloning of chicken IL-7 and characterization of its antiviral activity against IBDV in vivo.

Authors:  Shanshan Huo; Liyue Wang; Yonghong Zhang; Jianlou Zhang; Yuzhu Zuo; Jian Xu; Dan Cui; Xiujin Li; Fei Zhong
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.