Literature DB >> 12382979

Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on late-phase osteotomy gap healing in a canine tibial model.

Nozomu Inoue1, Isao Ohnishi, Dongan Chen, Luke W Deitz, Jeffrey D Schwardt, Edmund Y S Chao.   

Abstract

The effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on late bone healing phases using an osteotomy gap model in the canine mid-tibia were investigated. A transverse mid-diaphyseal tibial osteotomy with a 2-mm gap was performed unilaterally in 12 adult mixed-breed dogs and stabilized with external fixation. Animals in the variable group (n = 6) were treated with PEMF for 1 h daily starting 4 weeks after surgery for a total of 8 weeks, whereas no stimulation signal was generated in the control group (n = 6). Functional load-bearing and radiographic assessments were conducted time-sequentially until euthanasia 12 weeks after surgery. Torsional tests and an analysis of undecalcified histology were performed on the retrieved mid-tibial diaphysis containing the osteotomy site. In the PEMF group, load-bearing of the operated limb recovered earlier when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Load-bearing in the PEMF group at 8 weeks was greater than in the control group (p < 0.02). The periosteal callus area increased following surgery at 6 weeks (p < 0.05) and thereafter (p < 0.01) in the PEMF group, while a significant increase was observed at 8 and 10 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05) in the control group. Both the normalized maximum torque and torsional stiffness of the PEMF group were significantly greater than those of the control group (p < 0.04 and p < 0.007, respectively). Histomorphometric analyses revealed greater new-bone formation (p < 0.05) in the osteotomy gap tissue and increased mineral apposition rate (p < 0.04) and decreased porosity in the cortex adjacent to the osteotomy line (p < 0.02) in the PEMF group. PEMF stimulation of 1 h per day for 8 weeks provided faster recovery of load-bearing, a significant increase in new bone formation, and a higher mechanical strength of the healing mid-tibial osteotomy. This study revealed enhancing effects of PEMF on callus formation and maturation in the late-phase of bone healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12382979     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00031-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  13 in total

1.  Real-time control of neutrophil metabolism by very weak ultra-low frequency pulsed magnetic fields.

Authors:  Allen J Rosenspire; Andrei L Kindzelskii; Bruce J Simon; Howard R Petty
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature.

Authors:  Remy V Rabinovich; Amgad M Haleem; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18

3.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the mRNA expression of CAII and RANK in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Li-Qun Huang; Qing-Jie Xia; Cheng-Qi He
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications.

Authors:  Peter J Nicksic; D'Andrea T Donnelly; Nishant Verma; Allison J Setiz; Andrew J Shoffstall; Kip A Ludwig; Aaron M Dingle; Samuel O Poore
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

6.  Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation in human osteoprogenitor cells by pulsed electromagnetic fields: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Justus H W Jansen; Olav P van der Jagt; Bas J Punt; Jan A N Verhaar; Johannes P T M van Leeuwen; Harrie Weinans; Holger Jahr
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Histological analysis of the effects of a static magnetic field on bone healing process in rat femurs.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli; Lucienne M Ulbrich; Deise Ponzoni; João Julio da Cunha Filho
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Emerging medical applications based on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 10 THz.

Authors:  Mats-Olof Mattsson; Myrtill Simkó
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-09-12

9.  The effect of magnetic fields on wound healing: experimental study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven L Henry; Matthew J Concannon; Gloria J Yee
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-07-25

10.  Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  O P van der Jagt; J C van der Linden; J H Waarsing; J A N Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.