Literature DB >> 12381629

Angioplasty, bypass surgery or medical treatment: how should we decide?

J P Pell1, M A Denvir.   

Abstract

Coronary revascularisation continues to be underused despite evidence that this results in poorer outcomes

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12381629      PMCID： PMC1767410          DOI： 10.1136/heart.88.5.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN： 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  17 in total

1.  Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization.

Authors:  H Hemingway; A M Crook; G Feder; S Banerjee; J R Dawson; P Magee; S Philpott; J Sanders; A Wood; A D Timmis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Panellist consistency in the assessment of medical appropriateness.

Authors:  J McDonnell; A Meijler; J P Kahan; S J Bernstein; H Rigter
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures.

Authors:  J P Kahan; R E Park; L L Leape; S J Bernstein; L H Hilborne; L Parker; C J Kamberg; D J Ballard; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Coronary revascularisation: why do rates vary geographically in the UK?

Authors:  N Black; S Langham; M Petticrew
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Coronary angiography and bypass surgery in Manitoba and the United States: a first comparison.

Authors:  L L Roos; R Bond; C D Naylor; M R Chassin; A L Morris
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Variations in use of cardiac services in England: perceptions of general practitioners, general physicians and cardiologists.

Authors:  A Chapple; A Gatrell
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-07

7.  Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality.

Authors:  N Payne; C Saul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

8.  Variation among hospitals in coronary-angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  J V Selby; B H Fireman; R J Lundstrom; B E Swain; A F Truman; C C Wong; E S Froelicher; H V Barron; M A Hlatky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic variations in the investigation and management of coronary heart disease in Scotland.

Authors:  M C MacLeod; A R Finlayson; J P Pell; I N Findlay
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Regional variation across the United States in the management of acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-1 Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  L Pilote; R M Califf; S Sapp; D P Miller; D B Mark; W D Weaver; J M Gore; P W Armstrong; E M Ohman; E J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245
View more
  2 in total

1.  Variations in clinical decision-making between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons; a case for management by multidisciplinary teams?

Authors:  M A Denvir; J P Pell; A J Lee; J Rysdale; R J Prescott; H Eteiba; A Walker; P Mankad; I R Starkey
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Decision-making in percutaneous coronary intervention: a survey.

Authors:  Catherine R Rahilly-Tierney; Ira S Nash
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.796
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.