Literature DB >> 12381322

Small libraries of protein fragments model native protein structures accurately.

Rachel Kolodny1, Patrice Koehl, Leonidas Guibas, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

Prediction of protein structure depends on the accuracy and complexity of the models used. Here, we represent the polypeptide chain by a sequence of rigid fragments that are concatenated without any degrees of freedom. Fragments chosen from a library of representative fragments are fit to the native structure using a greedy build-up method. This gives a one-dimensional representation of native protein three-dimensional structure whose quality depends on the nature of the library. We use a novel clustering method to construct libraries that differ in the fragment length (four to seven residues) and number of representative fragments they contain (25-300). Each library is characterized by the quality of fit (accuracy) and the number of allowed states per residue (complexity). We find that the accuracy depends on the complexity and varies from 2.9A for a 2.7-state model on the basis of fragments of length 7-0.76A for a 15-state model on the basis of fragments of length 5. Our goal is to find representations that are both accurate and economical (low complexity). The models defined here are substantially better in this regard: with ten states per residue we approximate native protein structure to 1A compared to over 20 states per residue needed previously. For the same complexity, we find that longer fragments provide better fits. Unfortunately, libraries of longer fragments must be much larger (for ten states per residue, a seven-residue library is 100 times larger than a five-residue library). As the number of known protein native structures increases, it will be possible to construct larger libraries to better exploit this correlation between neighboring residues. Our fragment libraries, which offer a wide range of optimal fragments suited to different accuracies of fit, may prove to be useful for generating better decoy sets for ab initio protein folding and for generating accurate loop conformations in homology modeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381322     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00942-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  59 in total

1.  Servers for sequence-structure relationship analysis and prediction.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Csaba Magyar; Gábor E Tusnády; Miklós Cserzo; András Fiser; István Simon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Some fundamental aspects of building protein structures from fragment libraries.

Authors:  J Bradley Holmes; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  On the use of low-frequency normal modes to enforce collective movements in refining macromolecular structural models.

Authors:  Marc Delarue; Philippe Dumas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reducing the dimensionality of the protein-folding search problem.

Authors:  George D Chellapa; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Describing RNA structure by libraries of clustered nucleotide doublets.

Authors:  Michael T Sykes; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Diversification of catalytic function in a synthetic family of chimeric cytochrome p450s.

Authors:  Marco Landwehr; Martina Carbone; Christopher R Otey; Yougen Li; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2007-03

7.  Fragment-HMM: a new approach to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Shuai Cheng Li; Dongbo Bu; Jinbo Xu; Ming Li
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately.

Authors:  Inbal Budowski-Tal; Yuval Nov; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Including Functional Annotations and Extending the Collection of Structural Classifications of Protein Loops (ArchDB).

Authors:  Antoni Hermoso; Jordi Espadaler; E Enrique Querol; Francesc X Aviles; Michael J E Sternberg; Baldomero Oliva; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2009-11-24

10.  Designing succinct structural alphabets.

Authors:  Shuai Cheng Li; Dongbo Bu; Xin Gao; Jinbo Xu; Ming Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.