Literature DB >> 12381240

The cost to the United Kingdom National Health Service of managing erectile dysfunction: the impact of sildenafil and prescribing restrictions.

Edward C F Wilson1, Emma S McKeen, Paul A Scuffham, Martin C J Brown, Kevan Wylie, Geoff Hackett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual direct cost of managing erectile dysfunction (ED) to the UK National Health Service (NHS) and to examine the impact of the introduction of sildenafil in 1998 and Schedule 11 restrictions in 1999.
DESIGN: A prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach was used. The period 1997 to 2000 was covered. The numbers of ED prescriptions, prosthesis implantations and general practitioner (GP) consultations were retrieved retrospectively from UK resource utilisation databases. The number of specialist consultations and psychosexual therapy sessions were estimated from NHS clinic data. National resource unit costs were applied. MAIN OUTCOMES AND
RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2000 the number of men presenting with ED increased from 79,800 to 257,984. The cost to the NHS increased from pounds sterling 29.4 million to pounds sterling 73.8 million (2000 estimates). The cost per patient fell from pounds sterling 368 to pounds sterling 286. In 1997, most NHS costs came from psychosexual therapy (30.7%), specialist consultations (20.2%) and intracavernosal injections (26.6%). By 2000, NHS costs came primarily from specialist consultations (32.0%), sildenafil prescriptions (26.2%), psychosexual therapy (13.6%) and GP consultations (12.0%). The annual cost was most sensitive to the number of drug prescriptions and specialist consultations.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased NHS cost of managing ED was due mainly to a three-fold increase in the number of men presenting to GPs, substantial numbers of whom were then referred for specialist consultations under Schedule 11 restrictions. This naturally resulted in the increased use of all resources including sildenafil. The cost effectiveness of transferring prescribing responsibility in cases of severe distress from specialists to GPs in primary care remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381240     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220130-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  21 in total

1.  Valuing the effects of sildenafil in erectile dysfunction. Strong assumptions are required to generate a QALY value.

Authors:  N Freemantle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Sexual dysfunction in primary medical care: prevalence, characteristics and detection by the general practitioner.

Authors:  S Read; M King; J Watson
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-12

3.  Why aged men become impotent.

Authors:  T Mulligan; P G Katz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-06

4.  Outcome analysis of goal directed therapy for impotence.

Authors:  J P Jarow; P Nana-Sinkam; M Sabbagh; A Eskew
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Initial uptake in use of sildenafil in general practice.

Authors:  D Williams; J Feely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Comparative results of goal oriented therapy for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  K A Hanash
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Cost utility analysis of sildenafil compared with papaverine-phentolamine injections.

Authors:  E A Stolk; J J Busschbach; M Caffa; E J Meuleman; F F Rutten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

8.  Impotence and aging: clinical and hormonal factors.

Authors:  F E Kaiser; S P Viosca; J E Morley; A D Mooradian; S S Davis; S G Korenman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Impotence in medical clinic outpatients.

Authors:  M F Slag; J E Morley; M K Elson; D L Trence; C J Nelson; A E Nelson; W B Kinlaw; H S Beyer; F Q Nuttall; R B Shafer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  A E Benet; A Melman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.241

View more
  5 in total

1.  Smoking and erectile dysfunction: findings from a representative sample of Australian men.

Authors:  C Millett; L M Wen; C Rissel; A Smith; J Richters; A Grulich; R de Visser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The invisible costs of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Systematic review and cost-of-illness analysis.

Authors:  Ludovica Borsoi; Patrizio Armeni; Gleb Donin; Francesco Costa; Luigi Ferini-Strambi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Ginseng for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Myeong Soo Lee; Tae-Hun Kim; Terje Alraek; Chris Zaslawski; Jong Wook Kim; Du Geon Moon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

4.  Increasing access to erectile dysfunction treatment via pharmacies to improve healthcare provider visits and quality of life: Results from a prospective real-world observational study in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Lauren J Lee; Terence A Maguire; Martine C Maculaitis; Birol Emir; Vicky W Li; Mara Jeffress; Jim Z Li; Kelly H Zou; Shaantanu S Donde; David Taylor
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The cost-utility of open prostatectomy compared with active surveillance in early localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Florian Koerber; Raphaela Waidelich; Björn Stollenwerk; Wolf Rogowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.