Literature DB >> 12381063

A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.

Mats Hallman1, Lars Sennerby, Stefan Lundgren.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to clinically and histologically evaluate the integration of titanium implants in different grafting materials used for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients and 36 maxillary sinuses were augmented with (1) autogenous particulated bone from the mandibular ramus, (2) bovine hydroxyapatite (BH) with membrane coverage, or (3) an 80/20 mixture of BH and autogenous bone. The grafts were allowed to heal for 6 to 9 months prior to placement of microimplants for histology and standard implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. After another 6 months of healing, when abutments were connected, the microimplants were retrieved for histologic and morphometric analyses. The outcome of the standard implants was clinically evaluated after 1 year of loading.
RESULTS: The mean bone-implant contact was 34.6 +/- 9.5%, 54.3 +/- 33.1%, and 31.6 +/- 19.1% for autogenous bone, mixture of 20% autogenous bone/80% BH, and 100% BH, respectively. The corresponding values for the bone area parameter were 37.7 +/- 31.3%, 39.9 +/- 8%, and 41.7 +/- 26.6%. The BH area was found to be 12.3 +/- 8.5% and 11.8 +/- 3.6% for 20% autogenous bone/80% BH and 100% BH, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for any parameter between any of the groups. After 1 year of loading, 6 of the 33 implants placed in autogenous bone grafts, 2 of the 35 implants placed in the BH/autogenous bone mixture, and 2 of 43 implants placed in BH were lost. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the groups. DISCUSSION: The histomorphometric analysis showed no differences between the 3 groups, indicating that autogenous bone graft can be substituted with bovine hydroxyapatite to 80% or 100% when used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The effect of adding autogenous bone remains unclear but may allow for a reduction of the healing time.
CONCLUSION: The results from this clinical and histologic study indicate that similar short-term results can be expected when using autogenous bone, BH, or a mixture of them for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12381063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  35 in total

1.  The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputerized tomography study.

Authors:  Sebastian Kühl; Christoph Brochhausen; Hermann Götz; Andreas Filippi; Michael Payer; Bernd d'Hoedt; Matthias Kreisler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials.

Authors:  A Martinez; J Franco; E Saiz; F Guitian
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Bone-defects healing by high-molecular hyaluronic acid: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alberto Baldini; Davide Zaffe; Gabriella Nicolini
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2010-06-29

4.  Expression of growth factors during the healing process of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures using autogenous bone grafts in combination with GTR and an anorganic bovine bone substitute: an immunohistochemical study in the sheep.

Authors:  Steffen Koerdt; Oliver Ristow; Andreas Wannhoff; Alexander C Kübler; Tobias Reuther
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Assessment of maxillary sinus lifting procedure in the presence of chronic sinusitis, a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Abdullah Atef Hammuda; Mohamed Moawad Ghoneim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-08

6.  Meta-analytic study of implant survival following sinus augmentation.

Authors:  Jessica Cabezas-Mojón; Cristina Barona-Dorado; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Fernando Fernández-Cáliz; José-María Martínez-González
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-01-01

7.  Influence of material properties on rate of resorption of two bone graft materials after sinus lift using radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Fawzi Riachi; Nada Naaman; Carine Tabarani; Nayer Aboelsaad; Moustafa N Aboushelib; Antoine Berberi; Ziad Salameh
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-31

8.  Repair of a perforated sinus membrane with a subepithelial palatal conjunctive flap: technique report and evaluation.

Authors:  S A Gehrke; S Taschieri; M Del Fabbro; S Corbella
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-04

9.  A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials.

Authors:  Jörg Handschel; Melani Simonowska; Christian Naujoks; Rita A Depprich; Michelle A Ommerborn; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Evaluation of dental socket healing after using of porous titanium granules: Histologic and histomorphometric assessment in dogs.

Authors:  Mohammad Tavakoli; Ahmad Moghareabed; Tayebeh Farsam; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Hamid Badrian; Navid Khalighinejad
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.