Literature DB >> 12380075

Mercury(II) sorption to two Florida Everglades peats: evidence for strong and weak binding and competition by dissolved organic matter released from the peat.

R Todd Drexel1, Markus Haitzer, Joseph N Ryan, George R Aiken, Kathryn L Nagy.   

Abstract

The binding of mercury(II) to two peats from Florida Everglades sites with different rates of mercury methylation was measured at pH 6.0 and 0.01 M ionic strength. The mercury(II) sorption isotherms, measured over a total mercury(II) range of 10(-7.4) to 10(-3.7) M, showed the competition for mercury(II) between the peat and dissolved organic matter released from the peat and the existence of strong and weak binding sites for mercury(II). Binding was portrayed by a model accounting for strong and weak sites on both the peat and the released DOM. The conditional binding constants (for which the ligand concentration was set as the concentration of reduced sulfur in the organic matter as measured by X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy) determined for the strong sites on the two peats were similar (Kpeat,s = 10(21.8 +/- 0.1) and 10(22.0 +/- 0.1) M-1), but less than those determined for the DOM strong sites (Kdom,s = 10(22.8 +/- 0.1) and 10(23.2 +/- 0.1) M-1), resulting in mercury(II) binding by the DOM at low mercury(II) concentrations. The magnitude of the strong site binding constant is indicative of mercury(II) interaction with organic thiol functional groups. The conditional binding constants determined for the weak peat sites (Kpeat,w = 10(11.5 +/- 0.1) and 10(11.8 +/- 0.1) M-1) and weak DOM sites (Kdom,w = 10(8.7 +/- 3.0) and 10(7.3 +/- 4.5) M-1) were indicative of mercury(II) interaction with carboxyl and phenol functional groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12380075     DOI: 10.1021/es0114005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Total mercury loadings in sediment from gold mining and conservation areas in Guyana.

Authors:  Joniqua Howard; Maya A Trotz; Ken Thomas; Erlande Omisca; Hong Ting Chiu; Trina Halfhide; Fenda Akiwumi; Ryan Michael; Amy L Stuart
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Periphyton and Flocculent Materials Are Important Ecological Compartments Supporting Abundant and Diverse Mercury Methylator Assemblages in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; Forrest E Dierberg; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Arsenic, chromium and mercury removal using mussel shell ash or a sludge/ashes waste mixture.

Authors:  Natalia Seco-Reigosa; Susana Peña-Rodríguez; Juan Carlos Nóvoa-Muñoz; Manuel Arias-Estévez; María J Fernández-Sanjurjo; Esperanza Alvarez-Rodríguez; Avelino Núñez-Delgado
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Time-Dependent Biosensor Fluorescence as a Measure of Bacterial Arsenic Uptake Kinetics and Its Inhibition by Dissolved Organic Matter.

Authors:  Hyun Yoon; Andrea Giometto; Martin P Pothier; Xuhui Zhang; Alexandre J Poulain; Matthew C Reid
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the Everglades Protection Area.

Authors:  Mark C Gabriel; Nicole Howard; Todd Z Osborne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The Effect of Natural Organic Matter on Mercury Methylation by Desulfobulbus propionicus 1pr3.

Authors:  John W Moreau; Caitlin M Gionfriddo; David P Krabbenhoft; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; George R Aiken; Eric E Roden
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Oligotrophic wetland sediments susceptible to shifts in microbiomes and mercury cycling with dissolved organic matter addition.

Authors:  Emily B Graham; Rachel S Gabor; Shon Schooler; Diane M McKnight; Diana R Nemergut; Joseph E Knelman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.