Literature DB >> 12379326

Production and characterization of clinical grade exosomes derived from dendritic cells.

Henry G Lamparski1, Anita Metha-Damani, Jenq-Yuan Yao, Sanjay Patel, Di-Hwei Hsu, Curtis Ruegg, Jean-Bernard Le Pecq.   

Abstract

We describe methods for the production, purification, and characterization of clinical grade (cGMP) exosomes derived from antigen presenting cells (APCs). Exosomes have been shown to have immunotherapeutic properties through their presentation of biologically relevant antigens [Nat. Med. 4 (1998) 594] and are being developed as an alternative to cellular therapies. Exosomes are 50-90-nm-diameter vesicles secreted from multivesicular bodies (MVBs) found in a variety of both hematopoietic and tumor cells. These particles contain antigen presenting molecules (MHC class I, MHC class II, and CD1), tetraspan molecules (CD9, CD63, CD81), adhesion molecules (CD11b and CD54), and costimulatory molecules (CD86); hence, providing them the necessary machinery required for generating a potent immune response [J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 20121; J. Cell. Sci. 113 (2000) 3365; J. Immunol. Methods 247 (2001) 163; J. Immunol. 166 (2001) 7309]. Exosomes from monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) were rapidly purified (e.g. 4-6 h of a 2-3 l culture) based on their unique size and density. Ultrafiltration of the clarified supernatant through a 500-kDa membrane and ultracentrifugation into a 30% sucrose/deuterium oxide (D2O) (98%) cushion (density 1.210 g/cm3) reduced the volume and protein concentration approximately 200- and 1000-fold, respectively. The percentage recovery of exosomes ranged from 40% to 50% based on the exosome MHC class II concentration of the starting clarified supernatant. This methodology was extended to a miniscale process with comparable results. Conversely, the classical differential centrifugation technique is a more lengthy and variable process resulting in exosomes being contaminated with media proteins and containing only 5-25% of the starting exosome MHC class II concentration; hence, making it difficult for their use in clinical development. Lastly, we developed the following quality control assays to standardize the exosome vaccine: quantity (concentration of MHC class II) and protein characterization (FACS). The combination of a rapid and reproducible purification method and quality control assays for exosomes has allowed for its evaluation as a cancer vaccine in clinical trials [Proc. Am. Soc. Oncol. 21 (2002) 11a].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12379326     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(02)00330-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  218 in total

1.  Role of exosomes released by chronic myelogenous leukemia cells in angiogenesis.

Authors:  Simona Taverna; Anna Flugy; Laura Saieva; Elise C Kohn; Alessandra Santoro; Serena Meraviglia; Giacomo De Leo; Riccardo Alessandro
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  A tetraspanin-family protein, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia-associated antigen 1, is induced by the Ewing's sarcoma-Wilms' tumor 1 fusion protein of desmoplastic small round-cell tumor.

Authors:  Emi Ito; Reiko Honma; Jun-ichi Imai; Sakura Azuma; Takayuki Kanno; Shigeo Mori; Osamu Yoshie; Jun Nishio; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Koichi Yoshida; Jin Gohda; Jun-Ichiro Inoue; Shinya Watanabe; Kentaro Semba
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Mechanism of transfer of functional microRNAs between mouse dendritic cells via exosomes.

Authors:  Angela Montecalvo; Adriana T Larregina; William J Shufesky; Donna Beer Stolz; Mara L G Sullivan; Jenny M Karlsson; Catherine J Baty; Gregory A Gibson; Geza Erdos; Zhiliang Wang; Jadranka Milosevic; Olga A Tkacheva; Sherrie J Divito; Rick Jordan; James Lyons-Weiler; Simon C Watkins; Adrian E Morelli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  A role for anti-CD45RB monoclonal antibody treatment upon dendritic cells.

Authors:  Hui Qi; Jin-Peng Liu; Chun-Yan Deng; Han-Xin Zhou; Shao-Ping Deng; Fu-Rong Li
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 5.  Exosomes: immune properties and potential clinical implementations.

Authors:  Nathalie Chaput; Clotilde Théry
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 9.623

6.  Exosomes as biomarker enriched microvesicles: characterization of exosomal proteins derived from a panel of prostate cell lines with distinct AR phenotypes.

Authors:  Elham Hosseini-Beheshti; Steven Pham; Hans Adomat; Na Li; Emma S Tomlinson Guns
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery.

Authors:  Elena V Batrakova; Myung Soo Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  The Fas/Fap-1/Cav-1 complex regulates IL-1RA secretion in mesenchymal stem cells to accelerate wound healing.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Kou; Xingtian Xu; Chider Chen; Maria Laura Sanmillan; Tao Cai; Yanheng Zhou; Claudio Giraudo; Anh Le; Songtao Shi
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Mature dendritic cells pulsed with exosomes stimulate efficient cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses and antitumour immunity.

Authors:  Siguo Hao; Ou Bai; Fang Li; Jinying Yuan; Suzanne Laferte; Jim Xiang
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Efficient production and enhanced tumor delivery of engineered extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Dionysios C Watson; Defne Bayik; Avinash Srivatsan; Cristina Bergamaschi; Antonio Valentin; Gang Niu; Jenifer Bear; Mitchell Monninger; Mei Sun; Aizea Morales-Kastresana; Jennifer C Jones; Barbara K Felber; Xiaoyuan Chen; Ihsan Gursel; George N Pavlakis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.