Literature DB >> 12378677

Is comparison of changes in cardiac output, assessed by different methods, better than only comparing cardiac output to the reference method?

N W F Linton, R A F Linton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12378677     DOI： 10.1093/bja/aef530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN： 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  A novel method of trans-esophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring utilizing peripheral arterial pulse contour with/without machine learning approach.

Authors:  Kazunori Uemura; Takuya Nishikawa; Toru Kawada; Can Zheng; Meihua Li; Keita Saku; Masaru Sugimachi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Can endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising following cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Jean-Luc Fellahi; Marc-Olivier Fischer; Audrey Dalbera; Massimo Massetti; Jean-Louis Gérard; Jean-Luc Hanouz
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Ole Broch; Jochen Renner; Jan Höcker; Matthias Gruenewald; Patrick Meybohm; Jan Schöttler; Markus Steinfath; Berthold Bein
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Pilot Study: Estimation of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output from Pulse Wave Velocity.

Authors:  Yurie Obata; Maki Mizogami; Daniel Nyhan; Dan E Berkowitz; Jochen Steppan; Viachaslau Barodka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Pulse Power Analysis to Monitor Cardiac Output in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Jayne Fawcett; R Michael Grounds; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 2.217
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.