A Vella1, P Shah, A S Reed, A S Adkins, R Basu, R A Rizza. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine whether rapid conversion to inactive and potentially antagonistic peptides could alter the response to GLP-1. METHODS: We evaluated the ability of exendin-4, a GLP-1 analogue resistant to degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase IV, to modulate insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake and suppression of glucose production in eight healthy subjects during infusion of GLP-1 (1.2 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)), exendin-4 (0.12 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)), or saline. Glucose was clamped at 5.3 mmol/l and insulin was infused to progressively increase insulin concentrations to about 65, 190 and 700 pmol/l, respectively. Endogenous insulin secretion was inhibited with somatostatin to ensure comparable portal insulin concentrations while glucagon and growth hormone were maintained at basal concentrations. RESULTS: Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon and growth hormone concentrations did not differ on the three occasions. In contrast, cortisol concentrations were greater during both exendin-4 (25.1+/-4.4 mmol/l per 7 h; p<0.01) and GLP-1, (17.0+/-2.0 mmol/l 7 h; p<0.05) than saline (13.5+/-1.5 mmol/l per 7 h). While insulin-induced stimulation of glucose disappearance at the highest insulin concentrations tended to be greater and insulin-induced suppression of glucose production lower in the presence of exendin-4 or GLP-1 than saline, the differences were not significant. CONCLUSION/ INTERPRETATION: Exendin-4 and GLP-1 increase cortisol secretion in human subjects. However, neither alters insulin action in non-diabetic human subjects. These data also suggest that the lack of an effect of GLP-1 on insulin action is not likely to be explained by rapid degradation to inactive or antagonistic peptides.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine whether rapid conversion to inactive and potentially antagonistic peptides could alter the response to GLP-1. METHODS: We evaluated the ability of exendin-4, a GLP-1 analogue resistant to degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase IV, to modulate insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake and suppression of glucose production in eight healthy subjects during infusion of GLP-1 (1.2 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)), exendin-4 (0.12 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)), or saline. Glucose was clamped at 5.3 mmol/l and insulin was infused to progressively increase insulin concentrations to about 65, 190 and 700 pmol/l, respectively. Endogenous insulin secretion was inhibited with somatostatin to ensure comparable portal insulin concentrations while glucagon and growth hormone were maintained at basal concentrations. RESULTS:Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon and growth hormone concentrations did not differ on the three occasions. In contrast, cortisol concentrations were greater during both exendin-4 (25.1+/-4.4 mmol/l per 7 h; p<0.01) and GLP-1, (17.0+/-2.0 mmol/l 7 h; p<0.05) than saline (13.5+/-1.5 mmol/l per 7 h). While insulin-induced stimulation of glucose disappearance at the highest insulin concentrations tended to be greater and insulin-induced suppression of glucose production lower in the presence of exendin-4 or GLP-1 than saline, the differences were not significant. CONCLUSION/ INTERPRETATION: Exendin-4 and GLP-1 increase cortisol secretion in human subjects. However, neither alters insulin action in non-diabetichuman subjects. These data also suggest that the lack of an effect of GLP-1 on insulin action is not likely to be explained by rapid degradation to inactive or antagonistic peptides.
Authors: Ron T Varghese; Chiara Dalla Man; Anu Sharma; Ivan Viegas; Cristina Barosa; Catia Marques; Meera Shah; John M Miles; Robert A Rizza; John G Jones; Claudio Cobelli; Adrian Vella Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Julio E Ayala; Deanna P Bracy; Freyja D James; Melissa A Burmeister; David H Wasserman; Daniel J Drucker Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: M A Burmeister; D P Bracy; F D James; R M Holt; J Ayala; E M King; D H Wasserman; D J Drucker; J E Ayala Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Lene Jessen; Eric P Smith; Yvonne Ulrich-Lai; James P Herman; Randy J Seeley; Darleen Sandoval; David D'Alessio Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Dale S Edgerton; Zhibo An; Kathryn M S Johnson; Tiffany Farmer; Ben Farmer; Doss Neal; Alan D Cherrington Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Elisabeth L Raab; Patricia M Vuguin; Doris A Stoffers; Rebecca A Simmons Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 3.619