Literature DB >> 1237817

Defective motor learning in ideomotor apraxia.

K M Heilman, H D Schwartz, N Geschwind.   

Abstract

Liepmann suggested that the left hemisphere contained the engrams for motor sequences. Other investigators have suggested that ideomotor apraxia may be caused by either a destruction of these engrams or a disconnection of these engrams from motor systems in the nondominant hemisphere. If these hypotheses are correct, then ideomotor apraxics should not only show a defect on previously learned motor tasks but also a defect in new motor learning. Nine right-handed, hemiparetic, aphasic apraxics were given six trials on a rotary pursuit meter. Eight right-handed hemiparetic, aphasic, nonaprixic patients served as controls. All subjects were instructed to use their left (nonparetic) hand. The performance of the control group on the sixth trial was significantly better than that on the first trial, showing a distinct learning effect. In the apraxic group, however, there was no significant difference between the first and sixth trial, suggesting a defect in motor learning. This defect appeared to be caused by a combined defect of both acquisition and retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1237817     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.25.11.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  9 in total

1.  Apraxia impairs intentional retrieval of incidentally acquired motor knowledge.

Authors:  Anna Dovern; Gereon R Fink; Jochen Saliger; Hans Karbe; Iring Koch; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Role of the pulvinar in ideomotor praxis.

Authors:  J E Shuren; L M Maher; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  [Apraxia--neuroscience and clinical aspects. A literature synthesis].

Authors:  T Platz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Motor Adaptation Deficits in Ideomotor Apraxia.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Lee H Stapp; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Ideomotor apraxia in agrammatic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Anahita Adeli; Jennifer L Whitwell; Joseph R Duffy; Edyth A Strand; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  A direct intervention program for chronic neurogenic dysphagia secondary to brainstem stroke.

Authors:  M A Crary
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Toward a narrower, more pragmatic view of developmental dyspraxia.

Authors:  Kyle J Steinman; Stewart H Mostofsky; Martha B Denckla
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Distortion of Visuo-Motor Temporal Integration in Apraxia: Evidence From Delayed Visual Feedback Detection Tasks and Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Rintaro Ishibashi; Yusaku Takamura; Emika Oda; Yukie Tanigashira; Masashi Kouno; Takanori Tominaga; Yurie Ishibashi; Hiroyuki Okuno; Kaori Nobusako; Takuro Zama; Michihiro Osumi; Sotaro Shimada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  The Semantics of Natural Objects and Tools in the Brain: A Combined Behavioral and MEG Study.

Authors:  Elisa Visani; Davide Rossi Sebastiano; Dunja Duran; Gioacchino Garofalo; Fabio Magliocco; Francesco Silipo; Giovanni Buccino
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.