Literature DB >> 12377319

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

Larry Kestin1, Neal Goldstein, Frank Vicini, Di Yan, Howard Korman, Alvaro Martinez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason <or=6, and clinical stage <or=T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA >or=10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason >or=7, or clinical T stage >or=T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12377319     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  31 in total

Review 1.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Current status of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Authors:  Kazuo Hatano; Hitoshi Araki; Mitsuhiro Sakai; Takashi Kodama; Naoki Tohyama; Tohru Kawachi; Masaharu Imazeki; Takayuki Shimizu; Tsutomu Iwase; Minoru Shinozuka; Hideyo Ishigaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Definition of the CTV prostate in CT and MRI by using CT-MRI image fusion in IMRT planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Hentschel; Wolfgang Oehler; Dirk Strauss; Andreas Ulrich; Ansgar Malich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Preliminary toxicity analysis of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0126 prostate cancer trial.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Yan Yan; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Walter R Bosch; Kathryn Winter; James M Galvin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Gerard C Morton; Matthew B Parliament; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jason A Efstathiou; Gregory C Sharp; Hsiao-Ming Lu; I Frank Ciernik; Alexei V Trofimov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  70 Gy or more: which dose for which prostate cancer?

Authors:  U Ganswindt; F Paulsen; A G Anastasiadis; A Stenzl; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Effect of Standard vs Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0126 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Jennifer Moughan; James Purdy; Walter Bosch; Deborah W Bruner; Jean-Paul Bahary; Harold Lau; Marie Duclos; Matthew Parliament; Gerard Morton; Daniel Hamstra; Michael Seider; Michael I Lock; Malti Patel; Hiram Gay; Eric Vigneault; Kathryn Winter; Howard Sandler
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Early clinical experience of radiotherapy of prostate cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Gianfranco A Pesce; Alessandro Clivio; Luca Cozzi; Giorgia Nicolini; Antonella Richetti; Emanuela Salati; Mariacarla Valli; Eugenio Vanetti; Antonella Fogliata
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  The "PROCAINA (PROstate CAncer INdication Attitudes) Project" (Part II)--a survey among Italian radiation oncologists on radical radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Berardino De Bari; Filippo Alongi; Pierfrancesco Franco; Patrizia Ciammella; Tarik Chekrine; Lorenzo Livi; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Andrea Riccardo Filippi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Radiation therapy approaches to the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Manish A Vira; Louis Potters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.