Literature DB >> 12375539

Sonographic estimate of birth weight: relative accuracy of sonographers versus maternal-fetal medicine specialists.

J Humphries1, D Reynolds, L Bell-Scarbrough, N Lynn, J A Scardo, S P Chauhan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative accuracy of predicting birth weight among registered diagnostic medical sonographers versus maternal-fetal medicine specialists. STUDY
DESIGN: Over 7 months all patients who delivered within 2 weeks and had sonographic measurements of femur length and head and abdominal circumferences by sonographers and physicians were included in the analysis. The exclusion criteria were multiple gestation and anomalous fetuses. Receiver operating-characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed to determine the ability to detect intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR; birth weight < 2,500 g) and macrosomia (birth weight > or = 4,000 g) among term (gestational age > or = 37 weeks) parturients. A level of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Among 365 patients recruited, the mean gestational age was 37.3 +/- 2.4 weeks with a mean birth weight of 3,083 +/- 72.5 g. Among term patients the prevalence of IUGR was 7.5% (18/238) and of macrosomia 12% (29/238). A significantly higher percentage of predictions were within 10% of the birth weight when obtained by sonographers (70%) than physicians (54%; p < 0.0001). Registered sonographers were significantly more likely to detect IUGR than the specialists (area under the ROC curves 0.97 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.92 +/- 0.02, respectively; p = 0.02). Both groups had similar accuracy in detecting macrosomic fetuses (area under the ROC curves 0.92 +/- 0.02 for sonographers and 0.90 +/- 0.02 for physicians; p = 0.40).
CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of birth weight is significantly more accurate when sonographers rather than maternal-fetal medicine specialists perform the ultrasonographic examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375539     DOI: 10.1080/jmf.11.2.108.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  4 in total

1.  A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term.

Authors:  W Siggelkow; M Schmidt; C Skala; D Boehm; S von Forstner; H Koelbl; A Tresch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight in New Zealand.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Cooper; Gregory P Tarr; Joanne Kelly; Colleen J Bergin
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-01-12

4.  Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Alexandros A Moraitis; Norman Shreeve; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Alexander E P Heazell; Jim G Thornton; Stephen C Robson; Aris Papageorghiou; Gordon C Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.