Literature DB >> 12375250

The uncemented Bi-Contact total hip arthroplasty.

Nitin P Badhe1, Richard C Quinnell, Peter W Howard.   

Abstract

We reviewed a consecutive series of 153 uncemented Bi-Contact (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in 138 patients who had been followed for at least 5 years (mean, 6.8 years; range, 5-9 years). The Bi-Contact uncemented THA consists of a straight femoral stem made of titanium alloy. The proximal portion of the stem is titanium plasma-sprayed. The cup is press-fit with or without hydroxyapatite coating with a facility for anchoring screws with a snap-fit polyethylene liner. The mean age of the patients was 70.8 years (range, 41-94 years). The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 41 (range, 20-80) improved postoperatively to a mean of 92 (range, 56-96). Three acetabular cups were revised for aseptic loosening, and 1 cup was revised for recurrent dislocation. To date, none of the stems have been revised for aseptic loosening. Radiographic evaluation of the remaining 149 hips revealed that the acetabular cup was stable in 146 hips and possibly unstable in the remaining 3 cases with nonprogressive osteolysis behind the cup. None of the stems showed any evidence of instability. Using the recommendation of revision as the endpoint, the cumulative survival for the prosthesis was 97.3% at a mean follow-up of 6.8 years (95% confidence interval, 95.9-99.4), with stem survival of 100%. In the medium-term, these results are comparable to cemented primary THA and justify the continued use of this prosthesis. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375250     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  [Cement-free and cemented Excia hip shaft prosthesis: comparison of intermediate term results].

Authors:  C Urschel; M Döring; W Strecker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  Girish Swamy; Alistair Pace; Conal Quah; Peter Howard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Radiological Evaluation of the Relationship Between Cortical Hypertrophy and Stress Shielding After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Stem.

Authors:  Makoto Kanto; Shigeo Fukunishi; Tomokazu Fukui; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Yu Takeda; Shinichi Yoshiya; Toshiya Tachibana
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-03

4.  Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Stefan Lakemeier; Guenter Aurand; Nina Timmesfeld; Thomas J Heyse; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies.

Authors:  Paul van der Voort; Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Jorrit Jasper; Marta Fiocco; Josepha W M Plevier; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Evaluation of the results from proximal fixation of uncemented conical femoral components in Dorr type C femurs.

Authors:  Munif Ahmad Hatem; Bernardo Ferreira da Luz; Rodrigo Nishimoto Nishi; Paulo Gilberto Cimbalista de Alencar
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-03-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.