Literature DB >> 12375089

Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship.

Mihael A Tarrant1, H Ken Cordell.   

Abstract

Public values toward forests have changed since the late 1980s, from a commodity-oriented perspective toward a more inclusive (commodity and non-commodity) orientation. This study examines the influence of four indicators of population diversity (age, ethnic background, place of residence, and gender) on amenity values of forests, environmental attitudes, and forest value-attitude correspondence. Four values of public and private forests were assessed, wood production (utilitarian value), clean air (a life support value), scenic beauty (an aesthetic value), and heritage (a spiritual value). Environmental attitudes were measured using a modified version of the New Environmental Paradigm scale. Five hundred and forty-eight randomly selected residents of households in 13 states of the Southern United States participated in a telephone interview. Age and ethnic background were found to moderate the value-attitude relationship, with the strength of the association being dependent upon the type of forest (i.e., public or private) and the forest value (i.e., utilitarian, life support, spiritual, and aesthetic). Females, younger persons (less than 43 years old), and whites reported lower utilitarian values of forests than their respective counterparts. Results are interpreted within the context of an emerging post-material society, in which a biocentric orientation to forests and the natural environment may be favored more by a younger (versus older) generation and increasingly racially diverse U.S. population. Implications for managing forests using a multiple-values (versus multiple-uses) approach are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375089     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

1.  Value orientation and forest management: the forest health debate.

Authors:  Jesse Abrams; Erin Kelly; Bruce Shindler; James Wilton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Environmental policy beliefs of stakeholders in protected area management.

Authors:  Tasos Hovardas; Kostas Poirazidis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Capturing old-growth values for use in forest decision-making.

Authors:  Rochelle J Owen; Peter N Duinker; Thomas M Beckley
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  What makes them pay? Values of volunteer tourists working for sea turtle conservation.

Authors:  Lisa M Campbell; Christy Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Perception of forest values in the alpine community of trentino region (Italy).

Authors:  Alessandro Paletto; Federica Maino; Isabella De Meo; Fabrizio Ferretti
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The right tree for the job? perceptions of species suitability for the provision of ecosystem services.

Authors:  Simeon J Smaill; Karen M Bayne; Graham W R Coker; Thomas S H Paul; Peter W Clinton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Urban Bird Feeding: Connecting People with Nature.

Authors:  Daniel T C Cox; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia.

Authors:  Patricia Carignano Torres; Carla Morsello; Luke Parry; Renata Pardini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.