Literature DB >> 12374250

Efficacy of brief couples support groups developed to manage the stress of in vitro fertilization treatment.

Mary Ellen McNaughton-Cassill1, J Michael Bostwick, Nancy J Arthur, Randal D Robinson, Gregory S Neal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of brief couples support groups offered concurrently with in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Couples in IVF treatment were given the option of participating in a biweekly support group at the IVF clinic at Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Tex. At least 1 member of 26 couples participated in the brief couples support groups, and at least 1 member of 19 other couples completed the questionnaires but did not attend the support group sessions and so comprised the control group. Facilitators used cognitive behavioral techniques to help participants process their feelings and cognitions about their infertility. Emotional and cognitive factors were assessed both before and after group attendance by using the Beck Depression Inventory; the Beck Anxiety Inventory; the Life Orientation Test, which assesses optimism and pessimism; the Survey of Personal Views, which measures irrational beliefs; and the Social Provisions Scale, which measures social support.
RESULTS: Women who attended group sessions were significantly less anxious after the IVF treatment than they were before the cycle (P < .001). Men who attended the group sessions were more optimistic than nongroup men or the women at the completion of the IVF cycle (P < .001) but endorsed greater numbers of irrational beliefs (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the service was relatively inexpensive compared with IVF in the civilian community, the complexity of IVF treatment and the logistic and psychological stress experienced by couples made it hard to form and maintain such groups. Nevertheless, both men and women derived psychological benefit from the group: women reported less anxiety and men greater optimism on completion of the group sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12374250     DOI: 10.4065/77.10.1060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  4 in total

1.  Psychiatric intervention improved pregnancy rates in infertile couples.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ramezanzadeh; Ahmad-Ali Noorbala; Nasrin Abedinia; Abbas Rahimi Forooshani; Mohammad Mehdi Naghizadeh
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-01

Review 2.  Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Frederiksen; Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard; Ninna Grønhøj Skovgård; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Robert Zachariae
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Supportive Social Interactions in Infertility Treatment Decrease Cortisol Levels: Experimental Study Report.

Authors:  Alicja Malina; Małgorzata Głogiewicz; Jakub Piotrowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-13

4.  Male subfertility: communication, care, coping. An explorative study.

Authors:  V Ninclaus; S Van Mossevelde; I Stuyver; M Grypdonck; P De Sutter; J Gerris
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.