Literature DB >> 12374137

An assessment of guidelines for prevention of ischemic stroke.

Robert G Hart1, Renee D Bailey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare methods and key management recommendations from recent stroke prevention guidelines.
METHODS: Systematic review of guidelines for prevention of ischemic stroke published in English between 1996 and 2001 was conducted, and recommendations were independently abstracted and compared.
RESULTS: Among 22 stroke prevention guidelines, information was provided about panel selection in 24%, funding source in 36%, consensus methods in 33%, and quantitative risk/benefit estimates in 38%. Eleven recommended anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, but eight different sets of criteria to identify high-risk patients were proposed. Recommendations regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis varied from general endorsement in a setting of low perioperative risk to routinely withholding surgery. All nine relevant guidelines endorsed aspirin in dosages between 50 and 325 mg/day for initial antiplatelet therapy following cerebral ischemia; six also suggested other antiplatelet agents as options for initial therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Current stroke prevention guidelines do not provide adequate methodologic information to permit assessment of their quality, potential bias, and clinical applicability. Management recommendations are relatively consistent but differ in several important areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12374137     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.59.7.977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  4 in total

1.  Wisdom of the expert crowd prediction of response for 3 neurology randomized trials.

Authors:  Pavel Atanasov; Andreas Diamantaras; Amanda MacPherson; Esther Vinarov; Daniel M Benjamin; Ian Shrier; Friedemann Paul; Ulrich Dirnagl; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Place of drug therapy in the treatment of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Norberto Andaluz; Mario Zuccarello
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Evolving Treatment Strategies for Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Renee Bailey Van Stavern; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-04

Review 4.  Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ulrich Siering; Michaela Eikermann; Elke Hausner; Wiebke Hoffmann-Eßer; Edmund A Neugebauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.