RATIONALE: Excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (nbm) in rats produce deficits in performance of the 5-choice serial reaction time (5CSRT) task, suggesting that basal forebrain cholinergic projections to the neocortex play an important role in visuospatial attention. However, non-selective damage induced by excitotoxins may have confounded the interpretation of the specific contribution of the corticopetal cholinergic neurons of the nbm to attentional processes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to produce selective immunolesions of the cholinergic neurons of the nbm in order to examine more precisely the role of the cholinergic projections of the basal forebrain on attentional performance in a 5CSRT task. METHODS: Rats received bilateral injections of the selective cholinergic immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin (0.067 microg/ microl, 1 microl) into the nbm after baseline training in the 5CSRT task. Performance of sham and nbm lesion groups was then assessed during baseline and increased task difficulty conditions. RESULTS: Contrary to results previously reported, accuracy of responding and behavioral inhibition were unaffected by the immunotoxin. Rats with nbm lesions showed, however, significant increases in omissions relative to control rats, most markedly during sessions with increased difficulty of signal detection, e.g., decreased stimulus intensity or duration. Magazine and correct latencies were unaffected, suggesting that the lesion-induced omissions were not due to changes in motivation. Omissions were highly correlated with percentage of choline acetylcholine transferase depletion. Reduced premature responses were also observed when the target stimulus was made less predictable. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 192 IgG-saporin lesion produced a different array of behavioral deficits than previously reported, these effects nevertheless are consistent with an important role of the basal forebrain cholinergic system in attentional function, in particular with accurate timing of stimulus presentation and target detection.
RATIONALE: Excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (nbm) in rats produce deficits in performance of the 5-choice serial reaction time (5CSRT) task, suggesting that basal forebrain cholinergic projections to the neocortex play an important role in visuospatial attention. However, non-selective damage induced by excitotoxins may have confounded the interpretation of the specific contribution of the corticopetal cholinergic neurons of the nbm to attentional processes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to produce selective immunolesions of the cholinergic neurons of the nbm in order to examine more precisely the role of the cholinergic projections of the basal forebrain on attentional performance in a 5CSRT task. METHODS:Rats received bilateral injections of the selective cholinergic immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin (0.067 microg/ microl, 1 microl) into the nbm after baseline training in the 5CSRT task. Performance of sham and nbm lesion groups was then assessed during baseline and increased task difficulty conditions. RESULTS: Contrary to results previously reported, accuracy of responding and behavioral inhibition were unaffected by the immunotoxin. Rats with nbm lesions showed, however, significant increases in omissions relative to control rats, most markedly during sessions with increased difficulty of signal detection, e.g., decreased stimulus intensity or duration. Magazine and correct latencies were unaffected, suggesting that the lesion-induced omissions were not due to changes in motivation. Omissions were highly correlated with percentage of choline acetylcholine transferase depletion. Reduced premature responses were also observed when the target stimulus was made less predictable. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 192 IgG-saporin lesion produced a different array of behavioral deficits than previously reported, these effects nevertheless are consistent with an important role of the basal forebrain cholinergic system in attentional function, in particular with accurate timing of stimulus presentation and target detection.
Authors: Jisook Moon; May Chen; Shruti U Gandhy; Myla Strawderman; David A Levitsky; Kenneth N Maclean; Barbara J Strupp Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Benjamin Kolisnyk; Mohammed A Al-Onaizi; Pedro H F Hirata; Monica S Guzman; Simona Nikolova; Shahar Barbash; Hermona Soreq; Robert Bartha; Marco A M Prado; Vania F Prado Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Sophia Vinogradov; Melissa Fisher; Heather Warm; Christine Holland; Margaret A Kirshner; Bruce G Pollock Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jared W Young; Susan B Powell; Victoria Risbrough; Hugh M Marston; Mark A Geyer Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Manuel Sanchez-Alavez; Patricia Robledo; Derek N Wills; James Havstad; Cindy L Ehlers Journal: Brain Res Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: William Davies; Trevor Humby; Wendy Kong; Tamara Otter; Paul S Burgoyne; Lawrence S Wilkinson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-02-28 Impact factor: 13.382