Literature DB >> 12373348

Evaluating the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

C Aul1, A Giagounidis, U Germing, A Ganser.   

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is their prognostic heterogeneity which complicates decision making regarding treatment for individual patients. The French-American-British (FAB) classification provides significant prognostic information, but carries the disadvantage of arbitrary demarcation of subgroups and overemphasis of morphological findings. In addition, there is considerable variation in survival and risk of acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) development even within defined FAB subgroups, particularly in patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Over the last 2 decades, several research groups have tried to identify additional clinical, hematological, and cell biological parameters in order to more accurately predict the natural course of MDS. These investigations have clarified that the number and extent of peripheral blood cytopenias, the bone marrow blast count, and the cytogenetic pattern are the most powerful prognostic indicators in MDS. Recent efforts have been directed at constructing prognostic scoring systems. These scoring systems try to enhance the predictive power by combining several features of the disease, which have proved their independent prognostic weight on multivariate analysis. The International MDS Risk Analysis Workshop substantially advanced the prognostic categorization of MDS patients by proposing a new scoring system (International Prognosis Scoring System, IPSS) that can be successfully applied to risk assessment of newly diagnosed patients and will likely prove useful for the design and analysis of therapeutic trials in MDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12373348     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-002-0530-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  5 in total

1.  The impact of category, cytopathology and cytogenetics on development and progression of clonal and malignant myeloid transformation in inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.

Authors:  Michaela Cada; Catherin I Segbefia; Robert Klaassen; Conrad V Fernandez; Rochelle A Yanofsky; John Wu; Yves Pastore; Mariana Silva; Jeffrey H Lipton; Josee Brossard; Bruno Michon; Sharon Abish; MacGregor Steele; Roona Sinha; Mark Belletrutti; Vicky Breakey; Lawrence Jardine; Lisa Goodyear; Lillian Sung; Mary Shago; Joseph Beyene; Preeti Sharma; Bozana Zlateska; Yigal Dror
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Expression of the proliferation-associated nuclear protein MIB-1 and its relationship with microvascular density in bone marrow biopsies of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Michael G Alexandrakis; Freda H Passam; Despina S Kyriakou; Constantina Dambaki; George Katrinakis; George Tsirakis; John Konsolas; Efstathios N Stathopoulos
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.611

3.  [Myelodysplastic syndromes].

Authors:  C Aul; A Giagounidis; U Germing
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  Familial Myelodysplastic/Acute Leukemia Syndromes-Myeloid Neoplasms with Germline Predisposition.

Authors:  Renata Lyrio Rafael Baptista; Anna Cláudia Evangelista Dos Santos; Luciana Mayumi Gutiyama; Cristiana Solza; Ilana Renault Zalcberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Usefulness of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Anna Kwiatkowska-Pamuła; Ewa Ziółko; Małgorzata Muc-Wierzgoń; Ewa Nowakowska-Zajdel; Ewa Podwińska; Tomasz Adamczyk
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2013-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.