Literature DB >> 12373307

Prognostic significance of Epstein-Barr virus involvement in gastric carcinoma in Japan.

Chihaya Koriyama1, Suminori Akiba, Tetsuhiko Itoh, Yuko Kijima, Kazunobu Sueyoshi, Alejandro Corvalan, Roberto Herrera-Goepfer, Yoshito Eizuru.   

Abstract

We examined the prognosis of 64 EBV-associated gastric carcinoma (EBV-GC) cases and 128 EBV-negative gastric carcinoma cases. EBV-GCs were identified by detecting EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) using in situ hybridization assay of paraffin-embedded tissue. For each EBV-GC case, 2 EBER-negative cases (EBV-negative cases) were selected, matching the EBV-GC case with respect to age, sex, tumor location, and depth of invasion. The average follow-up period was 70.9 months (SD=61.1) in EBV-GCs and 63.8 months (SD=59.7) in EBV-negative cases. Tumor-advanced stage determined by TNM classification of UICC, tumor location, and p53 over-expression were statistically significant prognostic factors. On the other hand, EBER expression was not related to the survival of patients. However, further analysis specific for intestinal and diffuse types of Lauren classification revealed that the association of EBER expression with prognosis was different in the two histological types. EBER expression was related to poor prognosis in intestinal-type carcinoma [hazard ratio (HR) =2.5, 95% confidence intervals (CI) =1.3-4.8] after adjusting for stage, p53 over-expression, and tumor location, whereas the diffuse-type EBV-GC had better prognosis (HR=0.4, 95% CI=0.2-0.9) even when lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas were excluded. To examine the interactive prognostic effects between EBER expression and p53 over-expression, the study subjects were divided into 4 groups on the basis of EBER expression and p53 over-expression. In intestinal-type tumors, the cases having both EBER expression and p53 over-expression showed the poorest prognosis (HR=10.0, 95% CI=3.3-30.4), and the cases with either EBER expression or p53 over-expression had an intermediate prognosis. In diffuse-type tumor, only EBER was an important prognostic factor. These results give additional evidence implicating EBV in the natural history of EBV-GCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12373307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Med        ISSN: 1107-3756            Impact factor:   4.101


  13 in total

1.  Improved survival of gastric cancer with tumour Epstein-Barr virus positivity: an international pooled analysis.

Authors:  M Constanza Camargo; Woo-Ho Kim; Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Alejandro H Corvalan; Keitaro Matsuo; Jun Yu; Joseph J Y Sung; Roberto Herrera-Goepfert; Fernando Meneses-Gonzalez; Yuko Kijima; Shoji Natsugoe; Linda M Liao; Jolanta Lissowska; Sung Kim; Nan Hu; Carlos A Gonzalez; Yashushi Yatabe; Chihaya Koriyama; Stephen M Hewitt; Suminori Akiba; Margaret L Gulley; Philip R Taylor; Charles S Rabkin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Complete response of a patient with advanced gastric cancer, showing Epstein-Barr virus infection, to preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin.

Authors:  Tomoko Seya; Noritake Tanaka; Kimiyoshi Yokoi; Noriyuki Ishikawa; Koji Horiba; Yoshikazu Kanazawa; Takeshi Yamada; Michihiro Koizumi; Seiichi Shinji; Hirotake Okazaki; Yoshiharu Ohaki; Toshiyuki Ishiwata; Zenya Naito; Takashi Tajiri
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  E-cadherin and beta-catenin expression in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma and their prognostic significance.

Authors:  Chihaya Koriyama; Suminori Akiba; Tetsuhiko Itoh; Kazunobu Sueyoshi; Yoshie Minakami; Alejandro Corvalan; Suguru Yonezawa; Yoshito Eizuru
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A combined histologic and molecular approach identifies three groups of gastric cancer with different prognosis.

Authors:  Enrico Solcia; Catherine Klersy; Luca Mastracci; Paola Alberizzi; Maria Elena Candusso; Marta Diegoli; Francesca Tava; Roberta Riboni; Rachele Manca; Ombretta Luinetti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Pathology of epstein-barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma and its relationship to prognosis.

Authors:  Hye-Jong Song; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  High levels of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in latently infected gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Julie L Ryan; Douglas R Morgan; Ricardo L Dominguez; Leigh B Thorne; Sandra H Elmore; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Jessica K Booker; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  Epstein-Barr virus serology and gastric cancer incidence and survival.

Authors:  J Koshiol; Y-L Qiao; S D Mark; S M Dawsey; C C Abnet; F Kamangar; E T Lennette; Z-W Dong; P R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Prognostic significance of Epstein-Barr virus infection in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuechao Liu; Jianjun Liu; Haibo Qiu; Pengfei Kong; Shangxiang Chen; Wei Li; Youqing Zhan; Yuanfang Li; Yingbo Chen; Zhiwei Zhou; Dazhi Xu; Xiaowei Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Immunoclassification characterized by CD8 and PD-L1 expression is associated with the clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Weili Wang; Kuansong Wang; Zihua Chen; Ling Chen; Wei Guo; Ping Liao; Daniel Rotroff; Todd C Knepper; Zhaoqian Liu; Wei Zhang; Howard L Mcleod; Yijing He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-06

10.  The Clinicopathological Features and Genetic Alterations in Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Surgery.

Authors:  Wen-Liang Fang; Ming-Huang Chen; Kuo-Hung Huang; Chien-Hsing Lin; Yee Chao; Su-Shun Lo; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Chew-Wun Wu; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.