Literature DB >> 12372892

Comparison of long-term results according to the primary mode of management and type of injury for posterior urethral injuries.

Ja Hyeon Ku1, Youn Soo Jeon, Min Eui Kim, Nam Kyu Lee, Young Ho Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with traumatic posterior urethral injuries, analyzed postoperative findings to compare the results of the primary mode of management, and evaluated whether the Colapinto and McCallum classification system was valuable for predicting the complications.
METHODS: 55 patients with traumatic posterior urethral injuries were included in the study. A total of 35 patients underwent immediate realignment over a Foley catheter including direct Foley catheter insertion (group 1) and 20 underwent initial suprapubic tube placement followed by delayed urethroplasty (group 2). Urethral injuries were interpreted using the Colapinto and McCallum classification based on the retrograde urethrographies.
RESULTS: 44 (80.0%) of the patients were classified to type III in both groups (group 1, 29 [82.9%]; group 2, 15 [75.0%]). Of group 1, mild, moderate and severe urethral strictures developed in 7 (20.0%), 8 (22.9%) and 6 (17.1%), respectively, and developed in 6 (30.0%), 2 (10.0%) and 5 (25.0%), respectively, of group 2. Six (17.1%) and 2 (20.0%) had decreased potency and 4 (11.5%) and 1 (5.0%) were impotent in group 1 and 2, respectively. Of group 1, incontinence developed in 3 patients but 1 did not need treatment, and developed in 2 (10.0%) but 1 (5.0%) did not need treatment of group 2. The score test for trend demonstrated that there were no significant differences of these results.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that complications in patients with posterior urethral injuries are not related to the primary mode of management. Because most injuries are type III, the evolution toward the classification system is needed. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12372892     DOI: 10.1159/000063947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes Following Primary Realignment Versus Suprapubic Cystostomy with Delayed Urethroplasty for Pelvic Fracture-Associated Posterior Urethral Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Light; Tanya Gupta; Maria Dadabhoy; Allen Daniel; Madura Nandakumar; Abigail Burrows; Sandeep Karthikeyan
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-11-13

2.  Factors that influence the outcome of open urethroplasty for pelvis fracture urethral defect (PFUD): an observational study from a single high-volume tertiary care center.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Yu-meng Zhang; Guido Barbagli; Jiong Zhang; Hong Xie; Ying-long Sa; San-bao Jin; Yue-min Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Emergency treatment of male blunt urethral trauma in China: Outcome of different methods in comparison with other countries.

Authors:  Yumeng Zhang; Kaile Zhang; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Complications of primary realignment of posterior urethral disruption after pelvic trauma.

Authors:  Mohammad Haidari; Alireza Azargoon; Hormoz Mahmoudvand; Vahid Almasi; Yadollah Pournia; Manouchehr Shams Khorramabadi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2014-03-01

Review 5.  Pro: endoscopic realignment for pelvic fracture urethral injuries.

Authors:  Daniel M Stein; Richard A Santucci
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-02

Review 6.  Pelvic fracture urethral injury in males-mechanisms of injury, management options and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel C Barratt; Jason Bernard; Anthony R Mundy; Tamsin J Greenwell
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.