Literature DB >> 12371166

Ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide emission from pig slurry applied to a pasture in New Zealand.

Robert R Sherlock1, Sven G Sommer, Rehmat Z Khan, C Wesley Wood, Elizabeth A Guertal, John R Freney, Christopher O Dawson, Keith C Cameron.   

Abstract

Much animal manure is being applied to small land areas close to animal confinements, resulting in environmental degradation. This paper reports a study on the emissions of ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) from a pasture during a 90-d period after pig slurry application (60 m3 ha-1) to the soil surface. The pig slurry contained 6.1 kg total N m-3, 4.2 kg of total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN = NH3 + NH4) m-3, and 22.1 kg C m-3, and had a pH of 8.14. Ammonia was lost at a fast rate immediately after slurry application (4.7 kg N ha-1 h-1), when the pH and TAN concentration of the surface soil were high, but the loss rate declined quickly thereafter. Total NH3 losses from the treated pasture were 57 kg N ha-1 (22.5% of the TAN applied). Methane emission was highest (39.6 g C ha-1 h-1) immediately after application, as dissolved CH4 was released from the slurry. Emissions then continued at a low rate for approximately 7 d, presumably due to metabolism of volatile fatty acids in the anaerobic slurry-treated soil. The net CH4 emission was 1052 g C ha-1 (0.08% of the carbon applied). Nitrous oxide emission was low for the first 14 d after slurry application, then showed emission peaks of 7.5 g N ha-1 h-1 on Day 25 and 15.8 g N ha-1 h-1 on Day 67, and decline depending on rainfall and nitrate (NO3) concentrations. Emission finally reached background levels after approximately 90 d. Nitrous oxide emission was 7.6 kg N ha-1 (2.1% of the N applied). It is apparent that of the two major greenhouse gases measured in this study, N2O is by far the more important tropospheric pollutant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12371166     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2002.1491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  6 in total

1.  Impact of raw pig slurry and pig farming practices on physicochemical parameters and on atmospheric N2O and CH 4 emissions of tropical soils, Uvéa Island (South Pacific).

Authors:  E Roth; P Gunkel-Grillon; L Joly; X Thomas; T Decarpenterie; I Mappe-Fogaing; C Laporte-Magoni; N Dumelié; G Durry
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated Swine feeding operations.

Authors:  Leah Schinasi; Rachel Avery Horton; Virginia T Guidry; Steve Wing; Stephen W Marshall; Kimberly B Morland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Key sources and seasonal dynamics of greenhouse gas fluxes from yak grazing systems on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Caiyu Yan; Cory Matthew; Brennon Wood; Fujiang Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Is Dairy Effluent an Alternative for Maize Crop Fertigation in Semiarid Regions? An Approach to Agronomic and Environmental Effects.

Authors:  Banira Lombardi; Luciano Orden; Patricio Varela; Maximiliano Garay; Gastón Alejandro Iocoli; Agustín Montenegro; José Sáez-Tovar; María Ángeles Bustamante; María Paula Juliarena; Raul Moral
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  The Effect of Chemical Amendments Used for Phosphorus Abatement on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Cattle Slurry: Synergies and Pollution Swapping.

Authors:  Raymond B Brennan; Mark G Healy; Owen Fenton; Gary J Lanigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes in soil profile under a winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain.

Authors:  Yuying Wang; Chunsheng Hu; Hua Ming; Oene Oenema; Douglas A Schaefer; Wenxu Dong; Yuming Zhang; Xiaoxin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.