BACKGROUND: Zenker's diverticula (ZD) can be treated by diverticulostomy or open surgery (upper esophageal sphincter myotomy and diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of the two alternative treatments. METHODS: Fifty eight patients were scored for symptoms and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure; relaxations and intrabolus pressures were recorded by manometry. Treatment depended on operative risk and ZD size. Twenty four patients with high surgical risk and/or a <3-cm or >5-cm pouch underwent diverticulostomy; the other 34 had open surgery. RESULTS: Mortality was nil. Five patients had postoperative complications after open surgery (p<0.05). Hospital stay was shorter after diverticulostomy (p<0.001). Follow-up (41 months; range, 1-101) was obtained in 53 patients. Postoperative manometry showed a UES pressure reduction, improved UES relaxation, and lower intrabolus pressure in both groups (p<0.05). In the diverticulostomy group, three patients complained of severe dysphagia. vs none in the open surgery group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Diverticulostomy is safe, quick, and effective for most patients with medium-sized ZD, but open surgery offers better long-term results and should be recommended for younger, healthy patients with small or very large diverticula.
BACKGROUND:Zenker's diverticula (ZD) can be treated by diverticulostomy or open surgery (upper esophageal sphincter myotomy and diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of the two alternative treatments. METHODS: Fifty eight patients were scored for symptoms and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure; relaxations and intrabolus pressures were recorded by manometry. Treatment depended on operative risk and ZD size. Twenty four patients with high surgical risk and/or a <3-cm or >5-cm pouch underwent diverticulostomy; the other 34 had open surgery. RESULTS: Mortality was nil. Five patients had postoperative complications after open surgery (p<0.05). Hospital stay was shorter after diverticulostomy (p<0.001). Follow-up (41 months; range, 1-101) was obtained in 53 patients. Postoperative manometry showed a UES pressure reduction, improved UES relaxation, and lower intrabolus pressure in both groups (p<0.05). In the diverticulostomy group, three patients complained of severe dysphagia. vs none in the open surgery group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Diverticulostomy is safe, quick, and effective for most patients with medium-sized ZD, but open surgery offers better long-term results and should be recommended for younger, healthy patients with small or very large diverticula.
Authors: Iain Alexander Murray; David R Grimes; Adam D Wilde; Jo Palmer; Carolyn Waters; Harry R Dalton Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Christian Rizzetto; Giovanni Zaninotto; Mario Costantini; Raffaele Bottin; Elena Finotti; Lisa Zanatta; Emanuela Guirroli; Martina Ceolin; Loredana Nicoletti; Alberto Ruol; Ermanno Ancona Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 3.452