Literature DB >> 12370753

Isolated trisomy of chromosomes 8, 11, 13 and 21 is an adverse prognostic factor in adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461.

Sherif S Farag1, Kellie J Archer, Krzysztof Mrózek, James W Vardiman, Andrew J Carroll, Mark J Pettenati, Joseph O Moore, Jonathan E Kolitz, Robert J Mayer, Richard M Stone, Richard A Larson, Clara D Bloomfield.   

Abstract

Isolated trisomy is a relatively common cytogenetic abnormality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but with uncertain prognostic significance. We studied a large cohort of newly diagnosed de novo AML patients karyotyped on CALGB 8461 from 1984-1999, where trisomy was the sole abnormality. The common isolated trisomies (IT(C)), +8, +11, +13 and +21, comprised 90% of all sole trisomies. The outcome of 101 IT(C) patients was compared to that of 976 with normal and "poor risk" cytogenetics. The overall survival (OS) for IT(C) patients was unsatisfactory with 10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3-17%] alive at 5 years. Repeated cycles of I/HDAC intensification did not improve outcome. However, SCT significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS). Among IT(C) patients <60 years in first remission, only 1 of 7 receiving SCT relapsed, compared to 16 of 19 patients treated with chemotherapy only. The prognosis of IT(C) was dependent on SCT. For non-transplanted patients, the 5-year OS for IT(C) was 5% (95% CI, 0-11%), compared to 20% (95% CI, 16-23%) for 640 normal cytogenetics patients. IT(C) was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS in non-transplanted patients. In those receiving SCT, however, the 5-year OS for IT(C) patients (69%, 95% CI, 32-100%) was not different to that of transplanted normal cytogenetics patients (60%, 95% CI, 38-81%). We conclude that in de novo adult AML patients not receiving SCT, IT(C) appears to independently predict a poor outcome that may be improved with SCT in first remission. Prospective studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12370753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  10 in total

1.  Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and sole trisomies of chromosomes 4, 8, 11, 13 or 21.

Authors:  Bhavana Bhatnagar; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Krzysztof Mrózek; Deedra Nicolet; Dimitrios Papaioannou; Christopher J Walker; Shelley Orwick; James S Blachly; Jonathan E Kolitz; Bayard L Powell; Andrew J Carroll; Richard M Stone; John C Byrd; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Trisomy 11 as an isolated abnormality in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with unfavorable prognosis but not with an NPM1 or KIT mutation.

Authors:  Faisal M Alseraye; Zhuang Zuo; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; Sa Wang; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Gary Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2011-04-25

3.  The MLL partial tandem duplication: evidence for recessive gain-of-function in acute myeloid leukemia identifies a novel patient subgroup for molecular-targeted therapy.

Authors:  Susan P Whitman; Shujun Liu; Tamara Vukosavljevic; Laura J Rush; Li Yu; Chunhui Liu; Marko I Klisovic; Kati Maharry; Martin Guimond; Matthew P Strout; Brian Becknell; Adrienne Dorrance; Rebecca B Klisovic; Christoph Plass; Clara D Bloomfield; Guido Marcucci; Michael A Caligiuri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Recombinant interleukin-2 in patients aged younger than 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 19808.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kolitz; Stephen L George; Don M Benson; Kati Maharry; Guido Marcucci; Ravi Vij; Bayard L Powell; Steven L Allen; Daniel J Deangelo; Thomas C Shea; Wendy Stock; Courtney E Bakan; Vera Hars; Eva Hoke; Clara D Bloomfield; Michael A Caligiuri; Richard A Larson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Metabolic restriction of cancer cells in vitro causes karyotype contraction--an indicator of cancer promotion?

Authors:  Ying Li; Paul Héroux; Igor Kyrychenko
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-11-17

6.  Central review of cytogenetics is necessary for cooperative group correlative and clinical studies of adult acute leukemia: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B experience.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek; Andrew J Carroll; Kati Maharry; Kathleen W Rao; Shivanand R Patil; Mark J Pettenati; Michael S Watson; Diane C Arthur; Ramana Tantravahi; Nyla A Heerema; Prasad R K Koduru; Annemarie W Block; Mazin B Qumsiyeh; Colin G Edwards; Lisa J Sterling; Kelsi B Holland; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Pretreatment cytogenetics add to other prognostic factors predicting complete remission and long-term outcome in patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461.

Authors:  Sherif S Farag; Kellie J Archer; Krzysztof Mrózek; Amy S Ruppert; Andrew J Carroll; James W Vardiman; Mark J Pettenati; Maria R Baer; Mazin B Qumsiyeh; Prasad R Koduru; Yi Ning; Robert J Mayer; Richard M Stone; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Amplification of c-MYC and MLL Genes as a Marker of Clonal Cell Progression in Patients with Myeloid Malignancy and Trisomy of Chromosomes 8 or 11.

Authors:  S Angelova; M Jordanova; B Spassov; V Shivarov; M Simeonova; I Christov; P Angelova; K Alexandrova; A Stoimenov; V Nikolova; I Dimova; P Ganeva; N Tzvetkov; E Hadjiev; S Toshkov
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.519

Review 9.  Chromosomal Instability in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Mateus de Oliveira Lisboa; Paulo Roberto Slud Brofman; Ana Teresa Schmid-Braz; Aline Rangel-Pozzo; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Aneuploid acute myeloid leukemia exhibits a signature of genomic alterations in the cell cycle and protein degradation machinery.

Authors:  Giorgia Simonetti; Antonella Padella; Italo Farìa do Valle; Maria Chiara Fontana; Eugenio Fonzi; Samantha Bruno; Carmen Baldazzi; Viviana Guadagnuolo; Marco Manfrini; Anna Ferrari; Stefania Paolini; Cristina Papayannidis; Giovanni Marconi; Eugenia Franchini; Elisa Zuffa; Maria Antonella Laginestra; Federica Zanotti; Annalisa Astolfi; Ilaria Iacobucci; Simona Bernardi; Marco Sazzini; Elisa Ficarra; Jesus Maria Hernandez; Peter Vandenberghe; Jan Cools; Lars Bullinger; Emanuela Ottaviani; Nicoletta Testoni; Michele Cavo; Torsten Haferlach; Gastone Castellani; Daniel Remondini; Giovanni Martinelli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.860

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.