Literature DB >> 12369923

Chitinolytic enzymes: catalysis, substrate binding, and their application.

T Fukamizo1.   

Abstract

After the epoch-making report on X-ray crystal structure of a lysozyme-N-acetylglucosamine trisaccharide complex in 1967, catalytic mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases have been discussed with reference to the lysozyme mechanism. From the recent findings of chitinolytic enzymes, however, the enzymes were found to have catalytic and substrate binding mechanisms different from those of lysozyme. Based on the X-ray crystal structures of chitinases and their complexes with substrate analogues, the catalytic mechanisms were discussed considering the relative locations of catalytic residues to the bound substrate analogues. Resembling the lysozyme catalytic center, family 19 chitinases, family 46 chitosanases, and family 23 lysozymes have two carboxyl groups at the catalytic center, which are separated (> 10 +) on either side of the catalytic cleft. The catalytic reaction of the enzymes takes place through a single displacement mechanism. In family 18 chitinases, one can identify only one catalytic carboxylate as a proton donor, but not the second catalytic carboxylate whose function and location are similar to those of Asp52 in lysozyme. The catalytic reaction of family 18 chitinases is most likely to take place through a substrate-assisted mechanism. Hen egg white lysozyme has the binding cleft represented by (-4)(-3)(-2)(-1)(+1)(+2). The binding cleft of family 19 chitinases, family 46 chitosanases, and family 23 lysozymes, however, is represented by (-3)(-2)(-1)(+1)(+2)(+3). Molecular dynamics calculation suggests that family 18 chitinases have the binding cleft, (-4)(-3)(-2)(-1)(+1)(+2). The functional diversity of the chitinolytic enzymes might be related to different physiological functions of the enzymes. The enzymes are now being applied to plant protection from fungal pathogens and insect pests. Structure of the targeted chitinous component was determined by a combination of enzyme digestion and solid state CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy, and have been taken into consideration for efficient application of the enzymes. Recent understanding of the catalytic and substrate binding mechanisms would be helpful as well for arrangement of a powerful strategy in such an application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 12369923     DOI: 10.2174/1389203003381450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci        ISSN: 1389-2037            Impact factor:   3.272


  41 in total

Review 1.  Potential role of chitinases and chitin-binding proteins in host-microbial interactions during the development of intestinal inflammation.

Authors:  H T Tran; N Barnich; E Mizoguchi
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Evolution, homology conservation, and identification of unique sequence signatures in GH19 family chitinases.

Authors:  N A Udaya Prakash; M Jayanthi; R Sabarinathan; P Kangueane; Lazar Mathew; K Sekar
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  A novel transition-state analogue for lysozyme, 4-O-β-tri-N-acetylchitotriosyl moranoline, provided evidence supporting the covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate.

Authors:  Makoto Ogata; Naoyuki Umemoto; Takayuki Ohnuma; Tomoyuki Numata; Akari Suzuki; Taichi Usui; Tamo Fukamizo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  High-capacity calcium-binding chitinase III from pomegranate seeds (Punica granatum Linn.) is located in amyloplasts.

Authors:  Chenyan Lv; Taro Masuda; Haixia Yang; Lei Sun; Guanghua Zhao
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2011-12

5.  Expression, purification, crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of ChiL, a chitinase from Chitiniphilus shinanonensis.

Authors:  Miruku Ueda; Makoto Shimosaka; Ryoichi Arai
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.056

6.  Characterization of the exosporium basal layer protein BxpB of Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  Christopher T Steichen; John F Kearney; Charles L Turnbough
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Research and application of marine microbial enzymes: status and prospects.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Se-Kwon Kim
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.118

8.  Structural relationships in the lysozyme superfamily: significant evidence for glycoside hydrolase signature motifs.

Authors:  Alexandre Wohlkönig; Joëlle Huet; Yvan Looze; René Wintjens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The first crystal structures of a family 19 class IV chitinase: the enzyme from Norway spruce.

Authors:  Wimal Ubhayasekera; Reetika Rawat; Sharon Wing Tak Ho; Malgorzata Wiweger; Sara Von Arnold; Mee-Len Chye; Sherry L Mowbray
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Antifungal activity of chitinases from Trichoderma aureoviride DY-59 and Rhizopus microsporus VS-9.

Authors:  Nam Van Nguyen; Young-Ju Kim; Kyung-Taek Oh; Woo-Jin Jung; Ro-Dong Park
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.