Literature DB >> 12369665

Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies: results of a multicenter European study.

Stefano Guerriero1, Juan Luis Alcazar, Maria Elisabetta Coccia, Silvia Ajossa, GianFranco Scarselli, Manuela Boi, Marta Gerada, Gian Benedetto Melis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale sonography and color Doppler imaging in the differential diagnosis of adnexal malignancies from benign complex pelvic masses in a multicenter prospective study.
METHODS: The study was performed as a collaborative work at 3 European university departments of obstetrics and gynecology. A total of 826 complex pelvic masses on which transvaginal sonography and evaluation of cancer antigen 125 plasma concentrations were performed before surgical exploration were included in the study. The scanning procedure was the same in the 3 institutions. An adnexal mass was first studied in gray scale sonography, and a probable histologic type was predicted. Second, solid excrescences or solid portions of the tumor were evaluated for vascular flow with color Doppler sonography (conventional or power). A mass was graded malignant if flow was shown within the excrescences or solid areas and benign if there was no flow. The overall agreement between the test result and the actual outcome was calculated by kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Color Doppler evaluation was more accurate in the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies in comparison with gray scale sonography (kappa = 0.82 and 0.65, respectively) because of significantly higher specificity (0.94 versus 0.84; P < .001). The evaluation of the cancer antigen 125 plasma concentration did not seem to increase the accuracy of either method.
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography in complex adnexal cysts seems to increase the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale sonography in the detection of adnexal malignancies in a large study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12369665     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.10.1105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  4 in total

1.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  A new computer-aided diagnostic tool for non-invasive characterisation of malignant ovarian masses: results of a multicentre validation study.

Authors:  Olivier Lucidarme; Jean-Paul Akakpo; Seth Granberg; Mario Sideri; Hanoch Levavi; Achim Schneider; Philippe Autier; Dror Nir; Harry Bleiberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Ovarian dysgerminoma in two sisters.

Authors:  Bander F Aldhafery
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2008-09

4.  The contribution of qualitative CEUS to the determination of malignancy in adnexal masses, indeterminate on conventional US - a multicenter study.

Authors:  Xinling Zhang; Yongjiang Mao; Rongqin Zheng; Zhijuan Zheng; Zeping Huang; Dongmei Huang; Jing Zhang; Qing Dai; Xiaodong Zhou; Yanling Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.