Literature DB >> 12368724

Technical considerations for late removal of aortic endografts.

Sean P Lyden1, JoAnne M McNamara, Yaron Sternbach, Karl A Illig, David L Waldman, Richard M Green.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become increasingly common during the past decade. Despite aggressive attempts to treat endoleak and graft failure with endovascular salvage procedures, some grafts necessitate surgical removal. We reviewed our experience with late endograft explantation in an effort to identify technical maneuvers critical for success.
METHODS: Of 110 patients treated with aortic abdominal endografts at the University of Rochester Medical Center between August 1997 and June 2001, five (4.5%) needed late graft removal. Medical records, radiographic files, and case report forms were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: One Talent (Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, Calif) and four Vanguard (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) grafts were removed at a mean of 32.7 months (range, 18 to 44 months) after implantation. One patient underwent conversion for rupture, three for endoleaks (one each with types I, II, and III), and one for stent separation from the graft material without endoleak or aneurysm expansion. Three cases were approached via the midline, one through a bilateral subcostal incision, and one through a retroperitoneal incision. Supraceliac aortic control was used in all patients. Removal of two of the Vanguard grafts necessitated extension of the aortotomy above the level of the renal orifices. One perioperative death occurred. The mean operative blood loss was 4700 mL (range, 1850 to 9000 mL), and length of stay was 19.8 days (range, 7 to 42 days).
CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality rates associated with late removal of endografts are significant. Removal of Vanguard devices can necessitate extension of the aortotomy above the renal arteries. We believe that control of the aorta well above the proximal fixation site is the key to removal and that continuous aortic exposure via retroperitoneal exposure is the best option in this situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Elective endovascular aortic repair conversion for type Ia endoleak is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality compared with primary juxtarenal aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Salvatore T Scali; Michael M McNally; Robert J Feezor; Catherine K Chang; Alyson L Waterman; Scott A Berceli; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Dania Daye; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

3.  Late conversion of endovascular to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Thomas L Forbes; David M Harrington; Jeremy R Harris; Guy DeRose
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Open Reintervention for Aneurysmal Sac Enlargement after EVAR.

Authors:  Genta Chikazawa; Arudo Hiraoka; Yuuki Hirai; Kentaro Tamura; Toshinori Totsugawa; Atsuhisa Ishida; Taichi Sakaguchi; Hidenori Yoshitaka
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-08-30

5.  Open repair of type III endoleak with preservation of the endograft for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Kirthi Bellamkonda; Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-12-27

6.  Technique of partial open surgical stent graft explantation with preservation of fenestrated stent graft component to treat recalcitrant type II endoleak.

Authors:  Jessica A Steadman; Bernardo C Mendes; Gustavo S Oderich
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2022-07-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.