OBJECTIVE: In patients with stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), the presence of collateral circulatory pathways may be crucial to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure, metabolism, and function. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether patients with asymptomatic stenosis of the ICA have a better collateral ability of the circle of Willis when compared with patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis. METHOD: Magnetic resonance angiography consisting of the circle of Willis was performed in 19 patients with severe asymptomatic ICA stenosis and in 21 patients with severe symptomatic ICA stenosis prior to carotid endarterectomy and in 53 control subjects. Between group comparisons were made for function (directional flow) and anatomy (diameter). RESULTS: In patients with asymptomatic ICA stenosis, the prevalence of collateral flow via the anterior communicating artery was significantly increased (37%, 7 of 19) compared with symptomatic patients (10%, 2 of 21) and control subjects (0%; P <.001). Patients with asymptomatic ICA stenosis demonstrated the largest mean diameter of the anterior communicating artery (1.33 +/- 0.18 mm) compared with patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis (1.22 +/- 0.18 mm) and control subjects (1.06 +/- 0.10 mm, P <.05). No differences in collateral flow pattern or diameter were found for the posterior communicating artery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present cross-sectional study demonstrates the importance of an adequate hemodynamic compensation via the circle of Willis in patients with ICA stenosis. Whether differences in collateral compensation can be used to select patients for CEA has yet to be determined.
OBJECTIVE: In patients with stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), the presence of collateral circulatory pathways may be crucial to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure, metabolism, and function. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether patients with asymptomatic stenosis of the ICA have a better collateral ability of the circle of Willis when compared with patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis. METHOD: Magnetic resonance angiography consisting of the circle of Willis was performed in 19 patients with severe asymptomatic ICA stenosis and in 21 patients with severe symptomatic ICA stenosis prior to carotid endarterectomy and in 53 control subjects. Between group comparisons were made for function (directional flow) and anatomy (diameter). RESULTS: In patients with asymptomatic ICA stenosis, the prevalence of collateral flow via the anterior communicating artery was significantly increased (37%, 7 of 19) compared with symptomatic patients (10%, 2 of 21) and control subjects (0%; P <.001). Patients with asymptomatic ICA stenosis demonstrated the largest mean diameter of the anterior communicating artery (1.33 +/- 0.18 mm) compared with patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis (1.22 +/- 0.18 mm) and control subjects (1.06 +/- 0.10 mm, P <.05). No differences in collateral flow pattern or diameter were found for the posterior communicating artery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present cross-sectional study demonstrates the importance of an adequate hemodynamic compensation via the circle of Willis in patients with ICA stenosis. Whether differences in collateral compensation can be used to select patients for CEA has yet to be determined.
Authors: R P H Bokkers; F J Wessels; H B van der Worp; J J M Zwanenburg; W P Th M Mali; J Hendrikse Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Henri J M M Mutsaerts; Jan Petr; Reinoud P H Bokkers; Ronald M Lazar; Randolph S Marshall; Iris Asllani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 3.240