BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A persistent infection by high-risk HPV is now considered as the major cause of cervical carcinoma. The use of a single cytological specimen for HPV DNA testing by two different molecular methods was analyzed and validated. STUDY DESIGN: HPV DNA testing by PCR-ELISA and hybrid capture II HPV test (HC-II), was investigated on 317 cytological samples obtained from Italian women. Two hundred twenty-seven women were referred to virological lab for HPV DNA testing during cytological routine screening and 90 during a cytological and virological follow-up after a conization or hysterectomy. RESULTS: Overall, the concordance between the two assays was high (K=0.87). Compared with PCR-ELISA, the HC-II showed a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 95.4%. Although the analytical sensitivity of the PCR-ELISA was higher, the performance of the two tests did not differ in recognizing HPV DNA positive patients with either low or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL). HPV DNA positivity was directly correlated with the severity of cytological diagnosis (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In view of the comparable results obtained with the two assays and of the ease of use, and higher throughput of HC-II, it seems advisable, with a single cytological specimen, to employ the HC-II test as a first-line assay, either for screening or diagnosis, and to perform reflex PCR on positive samples, if typing of prevalent high risk HPVs is needed.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A persistent infection by high-risk HPV is now considered as the major cause of cervical carcinoma. The use of a single cytological specimen for HPV DNA testing by two different molecular methods was analyzed and validated. STUDY DESIGN: HPV DNA testing by PCR-ELISA and hybrid capture II HPV test (HC-II), was investigated on 317 cytological samples obtained from Italian women. Two hundred twenty-seven women were referred to virological lab for HPV DNA testing during cytological routine screening and 90 during a cytological and virological follow-up after a conization or hysterectomy. RESULTS: Overall, the concordance between the two assays was high (K=0.87). Compared with PCR-ELISA, the HC-II showed a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 95.4%. Although the analytical sensitivity of the PCR-ELISA was higher, the performance of the two tests did not differ in recognizing HPV DNA positive patients with either low or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL). HPV DNA positivity was directly correlated with the severity of cytological diagnosis (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In view of the comparable results obtained with the two assays and of the ease of use, and higher throughput of HC-II, it seems advisable, with a single cytological specimen, to employ the HC-II test as a first-line assay, either for screening or diagnosis, and to perform reflex PCR on positive samples, if typing of prevalent high risk HPVs is needed.
Authors: S-M Kulmala; S Syrjänen; I Shabalova; N Petrovichev; V Kozachenko; J Podistov; O Ivanchenko; S Zakharenko; R Nerovjna; L Kljukina; M Branovskaja; V Grunberga; A Juschenko; P Tosi; R Santopietro; K Syrjänen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hung N Luu; Kristina R Dahlstrom; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Helena M VonVille; Michael E Scheurer Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Joakim Dillner; Matejka Rebolj; Philippe Birembaut; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Anne Szarewski; Christian Munk; Silvia de Sanjose; Pontus Naucler; Belen Lloveras; Susanne Kjaer; Jack Cuzick; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Christine Clavel; Thomas Iftner Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-10-13
Authors: Narcisa Muresu; Giovanni Sotgiu; Silvia Marras; Davide Gentili; Illari Sechi; Andrea Cossu; Arianna Dettori; Roberto Enrico Pietri; Luisa Paoni; Maria Eugenia Ghi; Maria Paola Bagella; Adriano Marrazzu; Antonio Cossu; Antonio Genovesi; Andrea Piana; Laura Saderi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 3.390