Literature DB >> 12365885

Payment under public and private insurance and access to cochlear implants.

Steven Garber1, M Susan Ridgely, Melissa Bradley, Kenley W Chin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants are expensive, yet often cost-effective. However, among hundreds of thousands of potential US candidates, only about 3000 received implants in 1999. To analyze whether insurance reimbursement levels may contribute to low access rates.
DESIGN: Surveys were performed during 1999 and 2000 of physicians and audiologists at clinics providing cochlear implant services, selected hospitals where surgery is performed, and state Medicaid agencies. Secondary data were obtained on Medicare payment rates and hourly incomes of otolaryngologists and audiologists. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-one physicians (response rate 67.9%), 111 audiologists (74.0%), 60 hospitals (73.2%), and 44 Medicaid agencies (86.3%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Reimbursement rates for selected Current Procedural Terminology codes and for cochlear implant systems (devices); time required to perform services; additional time not reimbursed; and device purchase prices.
RESULTS: Medicare and Medicaid payment rates often fail to cover costs of aural rehabilitation. Medicare sometimes and Medicaid often fails to cover surgeon costs. Sometimes private insurance does not cover hospitals' device costs. Under Medicare, in 1999 hospitals lost more than $10 000 per device for inpatient surgery and about $5000 per device for each outpatient surgery. Device reimbursement in 2002 for outpatient surgery under Medicare is about $3773 higher than in 1999. Medicaid device payment policies vary greatly and fail to cover costs in at least 18 states, accounting for 44% of national Medicaid enrollment.
CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to expand access to cochlear implants may be impeded by financial incentives. Facilitating access for Medicare and Medicaid patients could require changes in payment policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12365885     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.128.10.1145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  5 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial adaptations to dual sensory loss in middle and late adulthood.

Authors:  Mark Brennan; Scott J Bally
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

Review 2.  Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margaret Barnett; Brian Hixon; Neville Okwiri; Catherine Irungu; John Ayugi; Robin Thompson; Jennifer B Shinn; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Factors Influencing Time to Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Meredith A Holcomb; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Determining treatment choices after the cochlear implant evaluation process.

Authors:  Andrew J Redmann; Kareem Tawfik; Theresa Hammer; Lisa Wenstrup; Shawn Stevens; Joseph T Breen; Ravi N Samy
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 5.  Barriers to Adult Cochlear Implant Care in the United States: An Analysis of Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Ashley M Nassiri; John P Marinelli; Donna L Sorkin; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.