SETTING: Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of urine dipsticks for monitoring adherence to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy. DESIGN: In-house urine dipsticks for detection of isoniazid (INH) metabolites were compared to commercial test strips. The value of n-butanol to detect rifampicin was compared to coloration of the urine. Non-adherence was assessed through a questionnaire and reviews of the Mulago Hospital TB register. RESULTS: Urine was obtained from 236 patients (127 adults and 109 children) on daily chemotherapy. Using commercial test strips as standard, the sensitivity of in-house urine dipsticks was 99.5% and specificity was 96.4%. The sensitivity and the specificity of n-butanol and of coloration of urine to detect rifampicin were low (64.0% and 54.9%, and 85.5% and 64.8%, respectively). Fifty patients (21.2%) admitted non-adherence to treatment during the previous month. An additional 15 (6.8%) were detected through urine testing. Of 911 patients in the TB register of Mulago Hospital who had started treatment in the first 3 months of 2000, 39.7% did not complete their treatment. Two-thirds of these had discontinued treatment in the first 2 months. CONCLUSION: In-house INH test strips are as effective as commercially available strips for detecting isoniazid in the urine. They are a simple tool for monitoring adherence. Adherence to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy as determined by the use of isoniazid test strips and review of the TB register showed poor compliance. Tests for rifampicin are less sensitive and specific.
SETTING: Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of urine dipsticks for monitoring adherence to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy. DESIGN: In-house urine dipsticks for detection of isoniazid (INH) metabolites were compared to commercial test strips. The value of n-butanol to detect rifampicin was compared to coloration of the urine. Non-adherence was assessed through a questionnaire and reviews of the Mulago Hospital TB register. RESULTS: Urine was obtained from 236 patients (127 adults and 109 children) on daily chemotherapy. Using commercial test strips as standard, the sensitivity of in-house urine dipsticks was 99.5% and specificity was 96.4%. The sensitivity and the specificity of n-butanol and of coloration of urine to detect rifampicin were low (64.0% and 54.9%, and 85.5% and 64.8%, respectively). Fifty patients (21.2%) admitted non-adherence to treatment during the previous month. An additional 15 (6.8%) were detected through urine testing. Of 911 patients in the TB register of Mulago Hospital who had started treatment in the first 3 months of 2000, 39.7% did not complete their treatment. Two-thirds of these had discontinued treatment in the first 2 months. CONCLUSION: In-house INH test strips are as effective as commercially available strips for detecting isoniazid in the urine. They are a simple tool for monitoring adherence. Adherence to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy as determined by the use of isoniazid test strips and review of the TB register showed poor compliance. Tests for rifampicin are less sensitive and specific.
Authors: Monica G Amuha; Paul Kutyabami; Freddy E Kitutu; Richard Odoi-Adome; Joan N Kalyango Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Sarah J Iribarren; Hannah Milligan; Cristina Chirico; Kyle Goodwin; Rebecca Schnall; Hugo Telles; Alejandra Iannizzotto; Myrian Sanjurjo; Barry R Lutz; Kenneth Pike; Fernando Rubinstein; Marcus Rhodehamel; Daniel Leon; Jesse Keyes; George Demiris Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Tom A Szakacs; Douglas Wilson; D William Cameron; Michael Clark; Paul Kocheleff; F James Muller; Anne E McCarthy Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2006-06-13 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Sylvia M LaCourse; Daniel Leon; Nuttada Panpradist; Barbra A Richardson; Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo; Jerphason Mecha; Daniel Matemo; Jaclyn N Escudero; John Kinuthia; Barry Lutz; Grace John-Stewart Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Sarah Iribarren; Hannah Milligan; Kyle Goodwin; Omar Alfonso Aguilar Vidrio; Cristina Chirico; Hugo Telles; Daniela Morelli; Barry Lutz; Jennifer Sprecher; Fernando Rubinstein Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-06-21
Authors: Ibrahim Sendagire; Maarten Schim Van der Loeff; Andrew Kambugu; Joseph Konde-Lule; Frank Cobelens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sylvia M LaCourse; Barbra A Richardson; John Kinuthia; A J Warr; Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo; Daniel Matemo; Lisa M Cranmer; Jaclyn N Escudero; Thomas R Hawn; Grace C John-Stewart Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 2.692