Literature DB >> 12364991

Prospective randomized trial to determine the influence of laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection on intravasal fibrinolytic capacity.

J Neudecker1, T Junghans, S Ziemer, W Raue, W Schwenk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the pneumoperitoneum decreases venous reflux from the lower extremities, the rate of thromboembolic complcations seems to be lower after laparoscopic than after conventional procedures. Therefore, it has been assumed that laparoscopic surgery better preserves the intravasal fibrinolytic capacity. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the operative technique on intravasal fibrinolytic capacity in colorectal resection.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trial conducted in parallel with the multicenter trial LAPKON II comparing the long-term effects of elective laparoscopic (group I) and conventional (group II) resections for colorectal cancer. Blood samples were taken from 30 patients preoperatively, at the beginning and end of surgery as well as 2, 8, and 24 hr postoperatively. Activities and concentrations of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), tPA/PAI complex, fibrinogen, and D-dimers were determined in all specimen with ELISA tests. Area under the curve values (AUC) were calculated for all parameters.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics and indication for surgery were not different between both groups. Preoperative values of fibrinolytic parameters were similar in both groups. Postoperatively, tPA activity decreased significantly in both groups, but AUC values for tPA and PAI-1 activity (p = 0.23; p = 0.68); concentration of tPA, PAI-1, and tPA/PAI complex (p = 0.52; p = 0.78; p = 0.95); and concentration of fibrinogen and D-dimers (p = 0.67; p = 0.71) did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: An intravasal fibrinolytic "shutdown" occurs not only after conventional but also after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Both operative techniques had similar effects on postoperative intravasal fibrinolytic capacity. Therefore, the lower incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic colorectal resections does not seem to be caused by a lesser depression of the intravasal fibrinolytic capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12364991     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9028-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  "Fibrinolytic capacity in peritoneal fluid after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection: data from a randomized controlled trial" by J. Neudecker et al.

Authors:  Manfred Nagelschmidt
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

Authors:  E Kuhry; W F Schwenk; R Gaupset; U Romild; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

3.  Alterations in homeostasis after open surgery. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  T Dedej; E Lamaj; N Marku; V Ostreni; S Bilali
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

4.  Fibrinolytic and coagulation pathways after laparoscopic and open surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Nikos Tsiminikakis; Elie Chouillard; Christos Tsigris; Theodoros Diamantis; Christine Bongiorni; Constantinos Ekonomou; C Antoniou; Ioannis Bramis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safe and effective? - A systematic review.

Authors:  Tania Lourenco; Alison Murray; Adrian Grant; Aileen McKinley; Zygmunt Krukowski; Luke Vale
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Hyaluronan levels during laparoscopic versus open colonic resections.

Authors:  J Neudecker; B A Neudecker; W Raue; R Stern; W Schwenk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.