BACKGROUND: Although many studies have compared open and laparoscopic procedures, showing many advantages in favor of the laparoscopic technique during the early postoperative period, only a limited number of reports in the literature compare the two techniques during the later follow-up period with regard to quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effects of these two cholecystectomy techniques on the quality of life and clinical outcome of the patients during long-term follow-up evaluation. METHODS: This study evaluated 200 patients who underwent cholecystectomy operations with either technique between 1993 and 1999 in our department. There were 100 patients in each group. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass indexes, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, and indications for surgery. The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 Health survey (SF-36), which includes 36 items, was used for evaluating the quality-of-life index. In addition to this, a system-specific instrument for gastrointestinal diseases was used to investigate clinical outcome. RESULTS: The mean administration time for the questionnaire was 46.8 +/- 18.7 months in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group and 41.5 +/- 16 months in the open cholecystectomy (OC) group. Statistically significant differences were noted in the scores for all eight SF = 36 health status domains in favor of laparospopic surgery. No statistically significant difference was found for abdominal pain, location of the pain, referral to a doctor for the pain, accompanying symptoms, relieving factors for the pain, distention, and dyspeptic complaints, usage of antacid therapy, weight changes, changes in bowel habit, need for a special diet, or sexual functions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The gastrointestinal clinical symptoms were similar in the two groups during the long-term follow-up evaluation, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy was found to be significantly superior to the open technique with respect to the quality of life over the long term.
BACKGROUND: Although many studies have compared open and laparoscopic procedures, showing many advantages in favor of the laparoscopic technique during the early postoperative period, only a limited number of reports in the literature compare the two techniques during the later follow-up period with regard to quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effects of these two cholecystectomy techniques on the quality of life and clinical outcome of the patients during long-term follow-up evaluation. METHODS: This study evaluated 200 patients who underwent cholecystectomy operations with either technique between 1993 and 1999 in our department. There were 100 patients in each group. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass indexes, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, and indications for surgery. The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 Health survey (SF-36), which includes 36 items, was used for evaluating the quality-of-life index. In addition to this, a system-specific instrument for gastrointestinal diseases was used to investigate clinical outcome. RESULTS: The mean administration time for the questionnaire was 46.8 +/- 18.7 months in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group and 41.5 +/- 16 months in the open cholecystectomy (OC) group. Statistically significant differences were noted in the scores for all eight SF = 36 health status domains in favor of laparospopic surgery. No statistically significant difference was found for abdominal pain, location of the pain, referral to a doctor for the pain, accompanying symptoms, relieving factors for the pain, distention, and dyspeptic complaints, usage of antacid therapy, weight changes, changes in bowel habit, need for a special diet, or sexual functions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The gastrointestinal clinical symptoms were similar in the two groups during the long-term follow-up evaluation, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy was found to be significantly superior to the open technique with respect to the quality of life over the long term.
Authors: H Kehlet; A W Gray; F Bonnet; F Camu; H B J Fischer; R F McCloy; E A M Neugebauer; M M Puig; N Rawal; C J P Simanski Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Allison Silverstein; Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri; Mussa R Gakwaya; Joseph Lule; Swagoto Mukhopadhyay; John G Meara; Mark G Shrime Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 4.584