Literature DB >> 12364300

Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut.

Grace Lu-Yao1, Peter C Albertsen, Janet L Stanford, Therese A Stukel, Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery, Michael J Barry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the more intensive screening and treatment for prostate cancer in the Seattle-Puget Sound area in 1987-90 led to lower mortality from prostate cancer than in Connecticut.
DESIGN: Natural experiment comparing two fixed cohorts from 1987 to 1997.
SETTING: Seattle-Puget Sound and Connecticut surveillance, epidemiology, and end results areas. PARTICIPANTS: Population based cohorts of male Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-79 drawn from the Seattle (n=94 900) and Connecticut (n=120 621) areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of screening for prostate cancer, treatment with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy, and prostate cancer specific mortality.
RESULTS: The prostate specific antigen testing rate in Seattle was 5.39 (95% confidence interval 4.76 to 6.11) times that of Connecticut, and the prostate biopsy rate was 2.20 (1.81 to 2.68) times that of Connecticut during 1987-90. The 10 year cumulative incidences of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy up to 1996 were 2.7% and 3.9% for Seattle cohort members compared with 0.5% and 3.1% for Connecticut cohort members. The adjusted rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality up to 1997 was 1.03 (0.95 to 1.11) in Seattle compared with Connecticut.
CONCLUSION: More intensive screening for prostate cancer and treatment with radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy among Medicare beneficiaries in the Seattle area than in the Connecticut area was not associated with lower prostate cancer specific mortality over 11 years of follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12364300      PMCID: PMC128373          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Authors:  J Concato; N Shah; R I Horwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Determining cause of death in prostate cancer: are death certificates valid?

Authors:  D F Penson; P C Albertsen; P S Nelson; M Barry; J L Stanford
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-12-05       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Implications of stage-specific survival rates in assessing recent declines in prostate cancer mortality rates.

Authors:  R E Tarone; K C Chu; O W Brawley
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; M L Lee; A J Belanger; L A Cupples; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A comparison of cause of death determination in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer who died in 1985 or 1995.

Authors:  P C Albertsen; S Walters; J A Hanley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria.

Authors:  G Bartsch; W Horninger; H Klocker; A Reissigl; W Oberaigner; D Schönitzer; G Severi; C Robertson; P Boyle
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part II: Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  E J Feuer; R M Merrill; B F Hankey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part III: Quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  R Etzioni; J M Legler; E J Feuer; R M Merrill; K A Cronin; B F Hankey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geographic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  G L Lu-Yao; D McLerran; J Wasson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics.

Authors:  C Percy; E Stanek; L Gloeckler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  37 in total

1.  Priorities in future research in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Screening without evidence of efficacy.

Authors:  Malcolm Law
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

3.  Screening populations at low risk carries high risks.

Authors:  Luc Bonneux
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

4.  Prostate specific antigen testing for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-05

Review 5.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 4.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; J Forth; S Sundar; E Kalu; C A M McNulty; E Sherriff; I D Watson; C Croucher; T M Reynolds; P J Carey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Treatment for PSA screen-detected prostate cancer: what are the options?

Authors:  R Tim D Oliver; David E Neal
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-01-27

7.  Screening, treatment, and prostate cancer mortality in the Seattle area and Connecticut: fifteen-year follow-up.

Authors:  Grace Lu-Yao; Peter C Albertsen; Janet L Stanford; Therese A Stukel; Elizabeth Walker-Corkery; Michael J Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The ethics of antenatal screening: lessons from Canute.

Authors:  Timothy M Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-11

10.  [Status of care for prostate cancer in 2008].

Authors:  B Arndt; M Kwiatkowski; F Recker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.