Literature DB >> 12363005

Molecular analysis of constitutively expressed erm(C) genes selected in vitro by incubation in the presence of the noninducers quinupristin, telithromycin, or ABT-773.

Franz-Josef Schmitz1, Jasmina Petridou, Nadine Astfalk, Karl Köhrer, Sybille Scheuring, Stefan Schwarz.   

Abstract

A Staphylococcus aureus strain that harbored a plasmid-borne inducibly expressed erm(C) gene was cultivated in the presence of the noninducers quinupristin, telithromycin, and ABT-773. After overnight incubation, 78 mutants that displayed combined resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramin B antibiotics, and ketolides were analyzed for the genetic basis of this altered resistance phenotype. Because this resistance phenotype is indicative for constitutively expressed erm(C) genes, the erm(C) regulatory regions of all mutants were sequenced. All 78 mutants showed sequence alterations in the erm(C) translational attenuator. Seventeen different types of sequence deletions ranging from 5 bp to 121 bp and nine different types of tandem duplications of 13-100 bp, all causing constitutive erm(C) gene expression, were detected. These sequence deletions or tandem duplications either favored the formation of mRNA secondary structures in the erm(C) translational attenuator, which did not inhibit translation of the erm(C) transcripts, or completely prevented the formation of any mRNA secondary structures in the erm(C) translational attenuator. The mean frequencies of 10-6 to 10-8 by which constitutive mutants were obtained, strongly suggest that telithromycin and ABT-773 not be recommended for the treatment of staphylococci that exhibit the inducible MLSB phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12363005     DOI: 10.1089/107662902760326878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  6 in total

1.  Differences in the DNA sequences in the upstream attenuator region of erm(A) in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and their correlation with macrolide/lincosamide resistance.

Authors:  Stella Z Doktor; Virginia Shortridge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Modes and modulations of antibiotic resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Florence Depardieu; Isabelle Podglajen; Roland Leclercq; Ekkehard Collatz; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  How Macrolide Antibiotics Work.

Authors:  Nora Vázquez-Laslop; Alexander S Mankin
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 4.  Lincosamides, Streptogramins, Phenicols, and Pleuromutilins: Mode of Action and Mechanisms of Resistance.

Authors:  Stefan Schwarz; Jianzhong Shen; Kristina Kadlec; Yang Wang; Geovana Brenner Michael; Andrea T Feßler; Birte Vester
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  The diversity of inducible and constitutively expressed erm(C) genes and association to different replicon types in staphylococci plasmids.

Authors:  Lisbeth E de Vries; Henrik Christensen; Yvonne Agersø
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2012-03-01

6.  In vitro activity of telithromycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin against methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci with defined resistance genotypes.

Authors:  G Novotná; J Spízek; J Janata
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.629

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.