Literature DB >> 12362470

Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection.

P M Visscher1, J A Woolliams, D Smith, J L Williams.   

Abstract

The proportion of cows in the UK dairy herd whose sires were misidentified was estimated using DNA markers. Genetic marker genotypes were determined on 568 cows (from 168 milk samples and 400 hair samples) and 96 putative sires (from semen samples). The estimated pedigree error rate from the hair samples was 8.8%, and from the milk samples, 13.1%, giving an overall estimate of the error rate of 10%. This level of pedigree errors will have a relatively large impact on the efficiency of progeny testing and the accuracy of cow predicted breeding values. We predict a loss of response to selection of approximately 2 to 3% given this error rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12362470     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74317-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

Review 1.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Application of DNA markers in parentage verification of Boran cattle in Kenya.

Authors:  David Kios; Estè van Marle-Köster; Carina Visser
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Holsteins are the genomic selection poster cows.

Authors:  Jeremy F Taylor; Kristen H Taylor; Jared E Decker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Power of exclusion of 19 microsatellite markers for parentage testing in river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).

Authors:  P Kathiravan; R S Kataria; B P Mishra
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Impact of depth of pedigree and inclusion of historical data on the estimation of additive variance and breeding values in a sugarcane breeding program.

Authors:  Felicity Claire Atkin; Mark J Dieters; Joanne K Stringer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Identification of Mendelian inconsistencies between SNP and pedigree information of sibs.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Han A Mulder; John W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Implementation of a parentage control system in Portuguese beef-cattle with a panel of microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Inês Carolino; Conceição O Sousa; Sónia Ferreira; Nuno Carolino; Fátima S Silva; Luís T Gama
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.771

8.  Single nucleotide polymorphism-based analysis of the genetic structure of Liangshan pig population.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Linyuan Shen; Zhixian Guo; Mailing Gan; Ying Chen; Runling Yang; Lili Niu; Dongmei Jiang; Zhijun Zhong; Xuewei Li; Shunhua Zhang; Li Zhu
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Effects of pedigree errors on the efficiency of conservation decisions.

Authors:  Pieter A Oliehoek; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for parentage assignment in New Zealand sheep.

Authors:  Shannon M Clarke; Hannah M Henry; Ken G Dodds; Timothy W D Jowett; Tim R Manley; Rayna M Anderson; John C McEwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.