PURPOSE: To determine the effect of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, using a superior clear-corneal incision, on the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) control in patients who have undergone previous trabeculectomy. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation (phaco group) at least 3 months after trabeculectomy were identified and matched to 28 patients who underwent trabeculectomy only (trabeculectomy-only group) with respect to age, gender, IOP, and duration of follow-up. The mean IOP was compared 1 and 2 years after phacoemulsification, and the surgical success rate in each group was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The mean IOP 1 year after cataract surgery was significantly higher ( = 0.025) in the phaco group (15.6 +/- 3.5 mm Hg) than in the trabeculectomy-only group (13.4 +/- 2.5 mm Hg), but at 2 years the difference was not statistically significant (15.3 +/- 3.1 mm Hg in the phaco group compared with 14.3 +/- 3.2 mm Hg in the trabeculectomy-only group; = 0.35). Two years after surgery, 5 of 28 patients in the phaco group and 1 of 28 patients in the trabeculectomy-only group had commenced or were using additional topical medication ( = 0.089). If the introduction of glaucoma medication was considered a "failure," then the IOP control was significantly better in the trabeculectomy-only group using two different criteria for surgical failure. CONCLUSION: Although phacoemulsification and IOL implantation through a superior clear-corneal incision have little effect on mean IOP in a group of patients who have undergone previous trabeculectomy, this procedure may jeopardize the long-term IOP control in individual patients.
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, using a superior clear-corneal incision, on the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) control in patients who have undergone previous trabeculectomy. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation (phaco group) at least 3 months after trabeculectomy were identified and matched to 28 patients who underwent trabeculectomy only (trabeculectomy-only group) with respect to age, gender, IOP, and duration of follow-up. The mean IOP was compared 1 and 2 years after phacoemulsification, and the surgical success rate in each group was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The mean IOP 1 year after cataract surgery was significantly higher ( = 0.025) in the phaco group (15.6 +/- 3.5 mm Hg) than in the trabeculectomy-only group (13.4 +/- 2.5 mm Hg), but at 2 years the difference was not statistically significant (15.3 +/- 3.1 mm Hg in the phaco group compared with 14.3 +/- 3.2 mm Hg in the trabeculectomy-only group; = 0.35). Two years after surgery, 5 of 28 patients in the phaco group and 1 of 28 patients in the trabeculectomy-only group had commenced or were using additional topical medication ( = 0.089). If the introduction of glaucoma medication was considered a "failure," then the IOP control was significantly better in the trabeculectomy-only group using two different criteria for surgical failure. CONCLUSION: Although phacoemulsification and IOL implantation through a superior clear-corneal incision have little effect on mean IOP in a group of patients who have undergone previous trabeculectomy, this procedure may jeopardize the long-term IOP control in individual patients.