Literature DB >> 12361565

DNA ligase IV-dependent NHEJ of deprotected mammalian telomeres in G1 and G2.

Agata Smogorzewska1, Jan Karlseder, Heidi Holtgreve-Grez, Anna Jauch, Titia de Lange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telomeres are required to prevent end-to-end chromosome fusions. End-to-end fusions of metaphase chromosomes are observed in mammalian cells with dysfunctional telomeres due to diminished function of telomere-associated proteins and in cells experiencing extensive attrition of telomeric DNA. However, the molecular nature of these fusions and the mechanism by which they occur have not been elucidated.
RESULTS: We document that telomere fusions resulting from inhibition of the telomere-protective factor TRF2 are generated by DNA ligase IV-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ gives rise to covalent ligation of the C strand of one telomere to the G strand of another. Breakage of the resulting dicentric chromosomes results in nonreciprocal translocations, a hallmark of human cancer. Telomere NHEJ took place before and after DNA replication, and both sister telomeres participated in the reaction. Telomere fusions were accompanied by active degradation of the 3' telomeric overhangs.
CONCLUSIONS: The main threat to dysfunctional mammalian telomeres is degradation of the 3' overhang and subsequent telomere end-joining by DNA ligase IV. The involvement of NHEJ in telomere fusions is paradoxical since the NHEJ factors Ku70/80 and DNA-PKcs are present at telomeres and protect chromosome ends from fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361565     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01179-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  159 in total

Review 1.  Telomere structure, function and maintenance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Karel Riha; Dorothy E Shippen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Degradation of p53, not telomerase activation, by E6 is required for bypass of crisis and immortalization by human papillomavirus type 16 E6/E7.

Authors:  H R McMurray; D J McCance
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Two modes of DNA double-strand break repair are reciprocally regulated through the fission yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  Miguel Godinho Ferreira; Julia Promisel Cooper
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  End resection initiates genomic instability in the absence of telomerase.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hackett; Carol W Greider
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  SNMIB/Apollo protects leading-strand telomeres against NHEJ-mediated repair.

Authors:  Yung C Lam; Shamima Akhter; Peili Gu; Jing Ye; Anaïs Poulet; Marie-Josèphe Giraud-Panis; Susan M Bailey; Eric Gilson; Randy J Legerski; Sandy Chang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Links between mutant p53 and genomic instability.

Authors:  Walter Hanel; Ute M Moll
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 7.  Telomere biology: integrating chromosomal end protection with DNA damage response.

Authors:  Predrag Slijepcevic; Suliman Al-Wahiby
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  POT1 protects telomeres from a transient DNA damage response and determines how human chromosomes end.

Authors:  Dirk Hockemeyer; Agnel J Sfeir; Jerry W Shay; Woodring E Wright; Titia de Lange
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Tying up the Ends: Plasticity in the Recognition of Single-Stranded DNA at Telomeres.

Authors:  Neil R Lloyd; Thayne H Dickey; Robert A Hom; Deborah S Wuttke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells.

Authors:  Andrea J Hartlerode; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.