Literature DB >> 12361501

Low speed frontal crashes and low speed rear crashes: is there a differential risk for injury?

Arthur C Croft1, Michael T Haneline, Michael D Freeman.   

Abstract

We compared male and female subjects in crash tests in which each subject experienced both frontal and rear impacts. Crash speed and other crash parameters were held constant. We believe this was the first experiment using an independent variable of crash vector and dependent variables of head linear acceleration and volunteer qualitative tolerance. Analysis of data revealed that the rear impact vector crash resulted in 2.8 times greater head linear acceleration than frontal crashes. Rear impact crashes resulted in biphasic, complex kinematics compared to the monophasic, less complex frontal crashes. Rear impact crashes were rated markedly less tolerable. Sex-specific differences are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med        ISSN: 1540-0360


  3 in total

1.  Minor crashes and 'whiplash' in the United States.

Authors:  Adam J Bartsch; Lars G Gilbertson; Vikas Prakash; Douglas R Morr; John F Wiechel
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10

2.  A Comprehensive Review of Low-Speed Rear Impact Volunteer Studies and a Comparison to Real-World Outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph Cormier; Lisa Gwin; Lars Reinhart; Rawson Wood; Charles Bain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Is Acceleration a Valid Proxy for Injury Risk in Minimal Damage Traffic Crashes? A Comparative Review of Volunteer, ADL and Real-World Studies.

Authors:  Paul S Nolet; Larry Nordhoff; Vicki L Kristman; Arthur C Croft; Maurice P Zeegers; Michael D Freeman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.